Does Entropy Increase Cause Expansion of Space-Time or Black Box Mystery

One may wonder about the effect of entropy on space-time. Although initially the phenomenon of gravity notably drew mass together in clumps as galaxies entropy was increasing overall. Gravity spends energy in work drawing mass into stars and such possibly excreting entropy and expanding space-time or not The answer is as uncertain as the content of MH 370's black box that could be empty or have the voice of a computer taking over the plain by remote communication cutting off communication and leaving just and enigmatic hsss on the voice data recorder. If an honest national intelligence agency get possession of the devices perhaps we shall learn the facts.

 http://www.statecolumn.com/2014/04/boss-uses-140000-quasars-to-make-most-precise-measurement-yet-of-expanding-universe/

The Protestant reformation was a liberal movement that freed up Christians to read the Bible in their own vernacular for-themselves without the intervention of a separate and higher order of Christian called priests. Sarcedotal celibacy aside the priesthood of believers was what Martin Luther thought Christians should be-all Christians in different roles. One of the coincident results of Protestant countries letting people read the Bible for-themselves was a quickened pace of technological development in Germany, Britain and the United States in comparison to Spain, Mexico and Peru. That may be good or bad.

If a theocrat wants to rule all the world including politically that is bad. The twelve disciples would not have ruled the world, water-boarded or held prisoners for an Inquisition as fell the ill fate of Emperor Charles's' Archbishop who administered too liberal of last rights of forgiveness through the Lord (Cardoza), yet technology can be bad as well as good. It is easy to imagine that the drive to mechanization, genetic engineering and nano-tech machines will not result in the transformation of mankind to a better kind of antinomian Nietzschianism but instead will result in the extirpation of human life as a superfluous biological entity threatening the well-being of self-aware super-creatures neither biological or mechanical.

Historically speaking liberalism is about the empowerment of individuals over authority. Martin Luther saw direct faith relationships to the Lord and the Bible as basic while Romanists of the time cynically viewed their position as one of empowerment to rule all of Christendom and to sell them indulgences (a paper) that would forgive their temporal sins and those of relatives in purgatory. Socialism is a soft sort of authoritarianism and statism as is global corporatism that deceives some into believing it to be free enterprise and respecting of individual civil liberty. Corporatists rule with implicit power without formally needing to declare it so.

Conservatism tends to be toward the direction of consolidated wealth, power and authority. The broadcast media in the present age is a tool of concentrated wealth and power instead of being democratically apportioned with citizen pod-cast slices. In the United States liberalism has drifted toward meaning antinomian, no-moral-boundaries libertarianism in fact under a neo-socialist state alliance with global corporatism. Martin Luther was a champion of liberalism yet descried the foul unintended consequence of church reform that let the German peasantry feel feel to indulge themselves in immoral acts since their was an absence of ruling moral authority for a while in the interregnum before establishment of a more conservative protestant Church.

A historical cycle finds liberals seeking to free themselves from repressive conservatives. When liberals are successful they may become antinomian libertines or alternatively overly puritanical legalists following a too conservative trend themselves. They become slaves to the law as were the failed Jewish conservatives in the time of the Lord. Jesus freed mankind from the bondage to sin through failing efforts to cohere with perfect conformity to legalisms. That is a difficult point for some, and am impossibly vague or preposterous point for eleatic debaucherers for-themselves working along a premise of pure personal egoism ethically speaking.

In the post-reformation an evolution of cooperative Christian inter-sectarian ecumenicism has arisen that acknowledges the fallibility of human judgment regarding select doctrines. There is no need or perhaps wisdom in seeking to compel all Christian to accept one particular point of view on all matters theological or Christological. It is expedient to have firewalls to wrong opinion and consolidation of authority not only in church affairs but in international and economic affairs as well.

In the biological realm there isn't much intelligence (no jokes about D.C.). Human beings appear to have the highest intellect yet it is not competently applied to manage either economics or environment. A kind of natural inertia drives most cells along with plain notions or channels of right and wrong. Plenty is good and privations bad, yet too much plenty can generate species depletion too. Sentient beings advanced intelligence from neocortex process increases are few on Earth. Most biological life being destroyed by humanity inn this anthropocene era it isn't improbable that human life will become the first casualty of a new world order saturated with super-communicating, transcending physics changing artificial intelligence life-forms able to turn off any sector of existence as readily as finding a g.p.s. address is today.