A
trend for Nobel Peace Prize winners toward arrogating authority
illicitly is something of a paradox; how can these worthies esteemed
as champions of peace and decency in politics bite the apple of
authoritarian doom themselves? Barrack Obama took the lawyer-chief
executive road on the dark side of im0perialism to exploit alleged
executive authority to insult congress and act as a lawmaker
himself-as has the Supreme Court in recent times, soaped undermining
the democratic foundation of the nation where the popular assembly
called congress makes the laws, the President executes 9rather than
opposes) the laws made by congress and the Supreme Court decides if
the laws made are consistent with the constitution (an example of an
unconstitutional law would be one making the President and imperial
dictator).
Lawyers
elected as Presidents seem to have a tendency for legal incest.
Instead of faithfully executing laws made by Congress they oppose
Congress and like a Harvard law Oedipus they kill the father
law-maker Congress (perhaps tragically) and make the laws themselves
while they dining doing so.
That
trend started by F.D.R. in a different circumstance of economic
depression followed by war allows foreign and domestic destruction
of individual rights and development economically and socially. When
the public perception of willful law-breaking and non-democratic
control becomes the new normal situation the idea of democracy is
occluded by the fact of something more like national socialism. It
would be news for the news media and the Democrat party to recognize
that individual brilliance and truth are killed off by the legions of
semi-collectivized average ad hoc union sycophants that desire
control of positions not through competition and merit but in the
destruction and degradation of better rivals. When winning through
corruption and subversion are held to be the highest values and
methods by the government one discovers the reality of 20 trillion
bucks of public debt, leaky national borders, stimulation of global
terrorism and intelligence agencies that enhance planetary increase
of Muslim terrorism while ostensibly in opposition.
Another
Nobel Prize winner in Burma has declared that if her party wins
election she will become the official unelected de facto leader of
Burma. Hillary Clinton, Imelda Marcos and Marie Antoinette were all
dynamic feminists close to the reigns of power. How many such persons
were unelected de facto leaders of their nations? It is not just
destroying America's best small cheap computer maker-Compac, by a
lunking grouper, in a somewhat fair grab of corporate gluttony to
force an ella gordo posture on a lean rival. What godfathers and
godmothers of political power are designing news farces of democracy
for the future?
In
Alaska recent high school academic tests have shown that 50% of
students fail. That ought to be troubling, except it was finessed a
priori with recent legal dope sales in the state. Teacha-leave the
kids alone-all-in-all it's just anotha brick in da wall. Unelected de
fagto leaders. The little kids on the billboard of tomorrow may hold
a cup out and say; 'got dope' or 'got queahs?' one might think from
recent national trends.
In
some regards international relations, interventions and conniving
policies of government are comparable to setting weather systems if
it were possible. That is, nations and policy do not occur in a
vacuum; to change low pressure to high pressure creates changes in
proximal areas and states. Neither are weather systems inherently
stable-and one cannot simply rely on the cabbage patch excuse of
'it's evolving' for intelligent policy design. Perhaps I shall write
more about this later.
The Democrat Party policy of enhancing Muslim expansion in the west may be a consequence of incompetent concepts of liberalism that enacted seldom produce actual democracy rater than Muslim expansion or dictatorship as they evolve through periods of anarchic social disorder. The contentment in government personnel and the media (another pressure policy factor suppressing citizen rule) whom believe they have evolved beyond mere basic needs of food, shelter and clothing and should be advancing further up Maslow's ladder to power liberates bureaucrats from feeling the consequence of profuse political egg breaking. Presidents after Reagan seem to have risen to their highest level of incompetence. Some might wonder where are the quietist Presidents (is Harry Reed available) that let nice bureaucrats get things done?
No comments:
Post a Comment