Considering Time and Space

Time in effect, doesn't exist. Mass and space exist, and of course many doubt that nothingness, aka empty space does. One must measure the change of a physical system with physical tools, and one may construct physical-even atomic clocks. Nothing in a physical system exists apart from the system to measure the rate of change of the system with. Local rates of change are observable to sentient beings. 

Massless particles don’t experience time because they haven’t mass. That may be a condition that exists because articles like photons are expressions at a point of waves of an electro-magnetic field. Massless particles pick up a third dimension in the Higgs field. Maybe that is a recombinant effect of two-dimension massless particles receiving the donation of a third dimensions via the Higgs field’s dimensional status. (I don’t know). One could compare it to massless flies entering the Higgs field soup transformed into croutons. One might wonder how many dimensions the Higgs field has in-itself. 

What is regarded as time is a human awareness of material change. Mass changes for and location and that is what is observed by humans. When mass changes at a regular rate and order the observation of that is considered to be time. People tend to think of time as independent and occurring for-itself regardless of mass, yet it isn’t. As the observer changes the position of his own mass. Perhaps being accellerated to a substantial percent of the speed of nearly massless photons his experience and basis of time is different than that of a stationary compatriot from his initial starting position. The experience of the passage of time is relative to speed and acceleration, in other words, to the status of mass.

If the entire Universe or mass is where time is embedded phenomenally, it is plain enough that the experience of the status, speed and configuration mass locally has its own relative time and configuration. It is comparable to the three-body problem of three spheres in space. If there were just two spheres in space and one was moving away it wouldn’t actually be possible to determine which one was moving away. With a third sphere, and with two stationary one might decide that one is moving away from the other two. The point of view is relative. With an infinity or whatever of particles of mass complicating the relationship of time calculations in existence the ‘time’ of mass still is found in the mass itself and nowhere else. One has the additional problem of anti-matter and its own time configurations and relativity for-itself and for-mass.  https://youtu.be/tc7LpJswIZU?si=YSEQxbITz_WsKAMc

It's Everett's many worlds paradigm created as an alternative to collapse of the wave-function. For each thought anyone has they switch to an appropriate Universe without awareness of the switch. There are an infinite number of Universes that already exist without time.. It is if they are static in the mind of God.  It hasn't anything to do with the Plank length which is a measurement designed by Max Plank. It is possible that time doesn't exist except as a kind of secondary appearance.  Last week some physicists released information about time being a by-product of quantum entanglement locally. If that is so the implication is that the entanglement occurs below the Plank length. Incidentally the God of Abraham would be fine with an infinite Multiverse. In fact it's almost a necessity since God is omnipotent and omniscient.An attribute of omnipotence  is that He has all possible infinity and possibility. Actually Universes might be just one thought of His mind, or nature. There may be countless other things that are noumenal for human knowledge.