8/1/10

Another Theory of Gravity (excerpt from St. Novilistricka: Dimensions 2nd edition)

Gravity may not exist. The behavior of matter we observe and call gravity exist obviously, yet the idea that has been given of a basic force or particle causing mass to attract at a distance may be wrong. Newton and Einstein each formulated laws describing the behavior of gravitational effects, yet Einstein went a bit farther and postulated that space-time is warped by gravity producing the attracting effect on mass. That paradigm of thought though mathematically consistent in describing gravitational behavior may be wrong as an explanation.

The gravitational effect may be restricted entirely to mass and energy without anything more than the displacement of space. In the increasing presence of mass space itself may be forced out of mass with corresponding effects on the quantum mechanical realm. In the quantum mechanical realm of uncertainty and entanglement of existential quantum probabilities a concentration of mass locally may increase the probabilities of the existence of mass given for a local area.

Mass has an unknown origin in the history of the cosmos. Speculation about big bang and inflation cosmology has reached even unto M-Theory or super-string theory and a pre-big bang era regime of a universe before this universe. Many of these hypothetical models arise as a consequent of the general theory of relativity and its equations exploited in an effort to find a theory of gravity that would fit with quantum mechanics. That entire effort may be wrong, as might hypothetical concepts about the cosmology of this Universe and space-time.

Logically an infinite singularity of mass at the beginning of the Universe is rather satisfying conceptually. Into an infinitely small and concentrated mass (or nearly so) a vast infusion of space was made sending it inflating outward faster than light. The subsequent history of the universe is of the work of mass to return to its initial nearly solid singular condition, and the four forces of nature are simply phases of the return of mass in various protocols of valence shells through charge paradoxes toward one untroubled infinite state.

Gravity does not need to exist as an independent force at a distance, and neither does space-time require any ability to be deformed, warped and so forth. Gravity may be nothing more than the natural coherence of one mass infused with space in the process of removing space from itself. The original space-time froth or emulsification of mass with space expanding faster than light slowed to sub-light speed, or a speed consistent with the maximum rate of travel of photons of the electro-magnetic field that would form one of the larger macro-scalar elements of the mass-energy field.

What is the nature of space? Space may be simply all possible dimensions fully extending of which the mass-energy of the Universe occupies a few. Instead of space-time there may be mass-time and space-dimensions. Time as a dimension may also be in a process of expulsion from mass generally as a temporal universal phenomenality.

Quantum mechanical uncertainty and field characteristics of intervals, aggregation and probabilities of determinism may pervasively cohere as characteristic of all mass sorting itself out of space. The mass-space segregation effects may create local and general streams of travel for mass to potentially take as increasing probabilities coinciding with Newtonian and Einstinean gravitational theory description parameters. In some ways the quantum realm associated with mass may form a comparative, analogous 4 dimensional (or more) structure of rivulets of potential flow for mass within the space dimensions. Time may be a ghostly, apparent attribute of mass extended in a space infused, emulsified state created as mass eliminates space in a protocol of renormalization. Time may be a local condition of mass and its pace of recovery from being spaced out in the beginning, and time may also be a relativistic measure of the field condition of mass regarding space content.”

No comments:

Alternative Courses to Nuking Hiroshima and Nagasaki

Hiroshima and Nagasaki were civilian targets. Truman had different courses to take yet he was a Democrat. Perhaps he could have nuked just o...