When Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke
stimulated the market announcing he would continue buying 85 billion dollars of
Treasury bonds monthly the market rose to an all-time high. Distributing wealth
to the rich and corrupt circles that brought America the 2008 financial
meltdown and excessive regulation is the unconventional wisdom for the day.
Pumping imaginary cash into the economy buying
mortgage backed securities (maybe better named dubious securities) with
the inflation rate about 1% and letting too big to be accountable bankers have
lots of no-interest cash to buy up everyone's distressed or foreclosed home is
a policy one might expect would create some sort of anomalous bubble never before
seen in our times. Chairman Bernanke said the unemployment situation is
actually worse than the 7.6% national average indicates. The obvious to select
elite economists is that reinforcing the rich is clearly the best way to bring
about full employment, good wages and jobs for all workers, a recovering
ecosphere and reduction of public debt.
Queen Hillary the first is looming in 2016. If the
Obama administration plan to reduce the U.S. public debt and budget deficit
running the total up to 21 trillion dollars with perennial deficits can't fix
the economic doldrum the winner of the Clinton vs. Bush title bout-one the
public has long clamored for, its like an Ali vs. Marciano fight after all will
get a shot. Cynics might prefer a womano y womano Bruser Hillary vs. Condi Rice
title fight yet like the Hearns vs. Leonard fight it's difficult to get a
brilliant yet out of play contender to step into the ring (although Leonard evolved
to that and did win).
Dialectical political evolution is experiencing a
comeback after the 1989 slump when the Reagan vs. Gorbachev dialectical led to
total ideological collapse of communism and even dialectics. The two-party U.S.
political dialectical evolution of political economy has demonstrated that
dialectical evolution is itself still a valid theory.
Like the two sides of a stationary rotating auger
pushing throw sludge or waste or other products the Republican and Democrat
parties are partisan dialectical opposites evolving the economy in a particular
way processing input through to output debt, unemployment and a deteriorating
national environment (ecosphere section). Without giving quantitative easing
relief to philosophers outside of academic not enough theoretical development
of post-cold war dialectical evolution has been funded by government extremists
content with the other corporate-government dialectical kickback evolution.
Dialectical political evolution is simply a stage
in the reduction of economic pluralism to monism. From a pluralistic economic
environment with a myriad of competitors an economy through networking and
inter-corporate board sharing and insider trading is reduced to a few
corporations with limited competition. It may evolve downward in number until a
two-stage dialectic evolves; yet like the tripartite foundation of the U.S.
Government before corporatism an economy works better with three rivals in a
trialectic evolution. More than that requires more than simple math to
calculate and is often avoided by politicians and economists.
A dialectical evolution of D.N.A. is the basis of
a human genome. A trialectical basis for the genome with an extra strand of
P.N.A. instead of D.N.A. would allow political dynasties to evolve within the
two party structure by surpassing the political mortality of term limits. Human
genes implicit let genetic chaos and mortality develop because of inherent
failure to recalibrate and return to original condition genetic stability. An
emergent lifetime of Clinton or Bush Presidencies could be negated by selection
or merger to a champion King or Queen Bush or Clinton with the evolved
dialectical kickback line of Presidential families racing to the top perfected
instate-of-the-art political laboratories in Boston.
For the time being the trialectical third helix of
political immortality is simple a shadow government ghost selecting the winners
and losers in American economic free enterprise. There may be an infinite
number of dialectical and trialectical systems in existence simultaneously if
they are not powerful enough to dominate or totalize national or global
economics.
A trialectical processes of reinventing the U.S.
economic system to expand beyond the rather myopic dialectical evolution toward
political pluralism and the goals of full employment, good wages for all,
decreasing concentration of wealth and increasing ecospheric health and
biological diversity isn't likely to occur without something of genius in U.S.
political leadership. That hope ended in the first Clinton administration's
echoed in the Hollywood zeitgeist Dumb and Dumber.
No comments:
Post a Comment