7/13/16

Why is Protest or Rioting First Response to Police Crimes?

President Obama has had it his way with black attorney generals during his administration. With youtube videos presenting to the public occasional and statistically rare crimes by police on black males enabling leverage for fair investigations and prosecutions why do people feel it necessary top create civil disorder as often as they can find even a nominal chance.

Many people are injured or arrested in the mass protests. Many people lose business while taxpayer cleanup costs increase and it accomplishes virtually nothing to process official investigations.

With the black Obama Justice Department if nothing objectively correcting follows civil rights violations their isn't much chance crimes by police on blacks that are killings would be set aside. All of the public mayhem and confusion doesn't help objective justice. Do blacks have no confidence in the Obama Justice administration?

http://www.people.com/article/baton-rouge-shooting-mass-protests-alton-sterling

President Obama speaking at the funeral for the five slain white police officers said that it was important for all sides to dialogue in effect, a community thing, whatever (paraphrase). There is just one side-that of law and order and he should have just reinforced that as chief enforcement officer of the U.S.A. An other 'side' has no right to shoot police officers.

No comments:

Imperfect Character is Universal

The question of why anything exists rather than nothing was a question that Plotinus considered in The Enneads. Why would The One order anyt...