1/27/19

Why Democrats Would Close the Government Over the Wall

The federal budget for 2018 was 3.4 trillion dollars. President Trump proposed a 4.47 trillion dollar budget. There are 1000 billion dollars in a trillion. Five or six billion dollars is a tiny, tiny fraction of 3.4 or 4 trillion dollars. For Democrats to shut down the government over such a tiny fractional portion of the federal budget was inexcusable. If President Trump had decided to close the government if Democrats would not eliminate 30 billion from the food stamp program, or shrink military wage 50% that might have been understandable.

Secrets of the Federal Budget Revealed

There are far larger chunks of money at play in Congress every year and Congress is not shut down over such issues. Unless funding is for abortion, murder, homosexual marriage or other heinous criminal activities there is little excuse for shutting a government down. Democrats should have funded the tiny item of meaning to tens of millions of honest American workers and moved on. Democrat Party leadership is corrupt and supports global corruption so long as their leadership is included in the politburo’s prioritization for goodies. Presently they want Hispanic votes and believe that a loose southern boundary best serves mutual Mexican-politburo interests. Some believe they are in collusion with Mexican drug cartels.

There may be payback at some future time when an actual important issue arises that Democrats want. Closing the government will be one way to make sure they don’t get it; even if it costs less than .06 percent of the federal budget. Important issues could arise; making an agricultural zoning law that requires variegated crop production to conserve soil fertility, requiring federal border wall barriers to be producers of solar power’d electricity, building a vast border desalinization of seawater irrigation canal network through evaporation and condensation fresh water generation of 1500 miles in compensation for global warming desertification, making no net loss of wild lands a requirement for building (maybe artificial mountain ranges covered with vegetation would work to comply with the law) etc.

Democrats have chosen to shut down the government over the issue by not signing off on funding for a well constructed slatted fence-wall for political reasons. The ability of cheap labor to illegally invade the United States and undermine supply and demand laws concerning labor satisfies those on Wall Street that have been happy with keeping the minimum wage of the nation from rising more than $5 in fifty years while Wall Street’s index has risen from 850 to 23,000.

Democrat Party leaders are not laborers, they are millionaires that enjoy illegal alien labor themselves in their vineyards, sweatshops, chicken pluking and slaughtering packing plants etc. They don’t give a rat’s a about U.S. labor.
There is no question about the Secure Fence Act of 2006 of the Bush administration increasing national security.The record shows that it did. More barriers will reinforce apprehensions of illegal entrants.

Mexico–United States barrier - Wikipedia

Where natural borders do not exist, physical borders need be constructed. Since the civil war combat engineers around the world have learned to construct earthworks defensive barriers. Democrats prefer electronic methods that require agents to go out and arrest individuals instead of deflecting them. In war for quite a time people liked using land mines rather than physical barriers such as defeated some landing craft at Normandy. Non-explosive, non-electronic methods of making borders to protect labor supply and demand are better than electronic that will fail whenever Wall Street decides it requires another 50,000 cheap workers in a year to gut wage increases versus profit increases for the 1%.

No comments:

Mr. Trump and the Retainer Paid to a Journalist

 So far as I have learned Donald Trump is on trial for 34 counts of paying a journalist not to publish bad news about him. Trump's attor...