American
public education may rank near the bottom of world standings in efficiency.
Considering how much K-12 educators are paid and how costly American public
schools are to taxpayers it is difficult to imagine that students of Liberia and the Congo wouldn’t finish ahead of U.S.A. in cost-per-student vs.
achievement-per-student efficiency. In Boston a fat kid drives an El Dorado to a vast H.S. parking
lot filled with student’s gas guzzlers; in Kenya a future winner of the
Boston Marathon might run miles to school, if a school exists. Reforms are
needed to sharpen wits and scholastic ratings of students.
In
some respects physical parameters for American public education haven’t changed
in a couple of centuries. Concentration of students from one-room schoolhouses
expanded to multi-story dwellings with thousands of students. Students herded
like cattle into K-12 corrals are moved from grade to grade ram-rodded under bureaucratic
cowgirls ripening the cattle on correct book-feed lots until ready for market.
Americans
are not invariably quick to accurately implant new technology in order to
increase citizen security and empowerment.
In the recent Michael Brown killing in a suburb of St. Louis one police micro
digi-camcorder pinned on a uniform might have eliminated voodoo legal
procedures presenting what really happened for grand jury as well as mob
review. A five-foot six policeman could have pressed a button to activate a
wireless connected cam-corder on his uniform and saved the incident with Brown on
his car’s computer keeping a virtual witness of what the gentle shoplifting
giant walking in the middle of the street did that brought the cop to fire his
gun. One might wonder if short cops are
responsible for most police shootings of tall black males or of short criminals
shoot most tall cops. Digi-cams that record audio-video for 5 minutes when
activated might help jurors determine legal culpability. Students and teachers
have been drawn into the classroom-of-the-absurd paradigmata of real reality
TV.
Public
school teachers in Washington D.C. have been given a
‘starter packet’ to help discuss the loss of another American to violence with
grieving, angry or curious students. When Malcolm X and Martin Luther King were
killed such Maoist quality teacher-indoctrination class room time did not generally
occur-and look what happened. To a certain extent students need to be taken out
of mass indoctrination loops and allowed to pursue their enlightened
self-interests in personalized educational settings.
I
am somewhat skeptical about the value of union and bureaucratic controls on
public education where little changes and too much is standardized. My
grandfather had just a 4th grade education at the turn of the 20th
century and though I took a Bachelor’s degree, he had a better quality of life.
An outdoorsman in the state of Washington in the first half of the
20th century experienced a healthier ecosphere than in the present
era of accelerated mass species die-off.
Practical Tex-Mex males during the last
building boom dropped often out after completing the legally required 8th
grade in order to work construction, perhaps brick laying, to raise a family
instead of pursuing pie-in-the-sky goals of higher education that can lead to
nowhere. Deferring gratification when there will be no gratification later
doesn’t seem too smart. Higher education in modern America can be a bridge to
nowhere.
A
close relation between mass production of engineers and manufacturing creates
realistic economic applications for education. In the U.S.A. high schools have become
something of a culture for themselves with education somewhat down-sized and
not uncommonly irrelevant to actual job prospects.
College
graduates after the 2008 financial crash had a much harder time finding a job.
Decentralizing schools and students might be a way to return the focus to
education instead of spectator sports, gangs and standardized curricula more
suitable for Maoist China than a free enterprise society.
Concentrated
capital tends to promote the most vicious to political and economic power. Competition
to remove government regulation of capital internationally is a
self-reinforcing phenomenal assault upon democracy and the idea of government
by and for the people.
Government
and economics exist to serve the interests of the people, especially the
overwhelming majority of the people, yet that point is too easily lost within
self-reinforcing corporatism supported with media propaganda and sycophant
politicos. American students do not learn to invent new reforms to government
and capitalism that would restore free enterprise and downgrade extreme capital
concentration. They do not learn the philosophy of philosophy, free thought and
the relationship of free enterprise to democracy, or that unfettered capitalism
is not the sole alternative to communism or socialism. Free enterprise can be
killed off with excessive capitalism.
It
is a real point that unlimited capital concentration is not required for free
enterprise and that economic adjustments through government regulation rightly adopted
can direct the entire free enterprise field toward more competition,
inventiveness and responsiveness to the material and spiritual interests of the
people of the United States.
With
an abundance of vacant office spaces it should be easy to rent private space
for small public education classes. Listings for quality-rated classroom space
might arise on eBay. Classrooms could be located closer to neighborhoods
reducing transport costs. Students ought to be able to walk to a classroom with
ten or twenty students. School districts could in effect have numerous
franchise outlets in rental spaces tied together through computer electronics.
Classrooms could be given chalkboard size tablet computer screens on which a
teacher could write upon images. A life-sized remote teacher could see and
instruct students. Perhaps qualified assistant teachers could help in some
classrooms for less cost than an actual teacher. More quality private teachers
could contract for teaching just one class-as adjunct professors might in
college. There would be no room for gangs in school.
Decentralizing
schools would save costs refurbishing obsolete and decrepit school facilities.
The private sector ought to be involved more in public education it is
presently. Even the Army contracted many of its former soldier tasks to the
private sector. Empty meeting halls, vacant convention centers, high-rise
office buildings and empty shopping malls might be good places to have ten or
twenty carefully selected students gather for a semester or two perhaps before
moving on to another location in the future. New jobs could appear interfacing
with decentralized school facilities that are closer to being privately
financed.
It
is possible that with a higher percent of students attending decentralized
schools in private facilities that a blending in of actual existing private
schools with the decentralized school system could be synthesized.
Private
schools classes could be rated and certified. Education contractors could interact with the
school district education programmer so students could move in and out of
private and public school courses seamlessly. Working toward graduation goals
could be monitored by a computer program following each student’s progress and
providing lists of all of the available course outlets relevant and available
in the school district in public and private school facilities. Some private
employers may want to hire a student-intern for a semester. Course apps for
available classes and classroom locations and spaces available ought to exist
live on each school district’s student access URL.
Students
working closer within a civil economic and neighborhood setting instead of
being alienated within separate, hierarchical, institutional pubic school
corrals might better understand the relationship between what is learned in the
classroom and what they experience every day in the real world. With so many
jobs being outsourced from the U.S.A., with so many illegal aliens and legal
foreign immigrants, with entire career fields disappearing as quickly as
morning dew in sunshine and with such a high cost of post-graduate continuing
education to private citizens changing the setting of secondary and
post-secondary in the U.S.A. might be a way to bring education to a closer
working synthesis with real economic and spiritual needs of the people. Making
education more responsive and adaptive than it is presently would be a first
step in creating a future U.S.A. capable of being a leader
in inventive and creative thought and applying that knowledge pragmatically.
Without
a better and reformed public education system American democracy will continue
to wither away under the influence of corporatism, media, concentrated wealth and
foreign competition.
No comments:
Post a Comment