Sheriff
Joe Arpaio defended the Republic from illegal immigration surging
into the U.S.A. and his country as best he could. Sheriff Arapio was America's point man on practical national defense while the congress was kissing its own butts doing nothing. President Obama,
the single day pardon record-holder for any president of the U.S.A.,
fundamentally supported amnesty for illegal aliens. Thus Arpaio
following his conscience and belief in the security of the United
States was bound to incur the wrath of the globalist evil empire and
the President of the United States’ justice department and local
judicial minions.
The
Arizona Republic; a Gannet newspaper that supports most things
leftist, globalist, homosexual and illegal alien entry in appearance
if not substance, ‘slammed’ the Arpaio pardon.
At
first I suspected the Arizona Republic was owned by Jeff Bezoz- the
first or second richest man on Earth and a prime member of the global
plutocracy. Bezos owns the Washington Post and Amazon.com. Discovery
that it is a Gannet paper, rather than locally owned, was just as
damning.
Sen. Jeff
Flake (R-Ariz),
an incumbent the President does not support for re-election, took a contrapositive
stance, tweeting that, “I
would have preferred that the President honor the judicial process
and let it take its course”.
President
Obama granted nearly 1800 pardons and clemencies starting his first
full year in office-2010.
One
fellow, apparently reformed, pardoned in 2011, had been arrested 13
times, smuggled drugs and was convicted of conspiracy. Hundreds of
the President Obama’s pardons and clemencies were for drug
offenses. Notoriously the President pardoned Bradley-Chelsea Manning,
for espionage. Sheriff Joe Arpaio was a career law enforcement agent
who never quit following that calling.
One may argue that Sheriff Arpaio broke the law himself in not exactly implementing a court order to stop profiling drivers that looked like Hispanic illegal aliens. If illegal aliens don't have legal driver's licenses that would provide probable cause of course, even so the Obama administration went to great lengths to allow global corporate to flood the nation with illegal, cheap workers to replace American ad hoc union wage-labor value.
In the end, if Sheriff Arapio broke a legal court order-and that is not certain depending upon several other legal questions, he acted out civil disobedience to support a majority opinion that illegal aliens should not be given easy entry into the United States. In my opinion civil disobedience to reinforce a majority opinion has greater moral claim that civil disobedience to reinforce a minority opinion. The judiciary has forced many legal finding in recent years upon the U.S. public that went counter to popular opinion. In a democracy one must ask how far a majority should go to let a judiciary dictate to it the political and social development of the nation based on constitutional constructivism.
http://thehill.com/homenews/house/348129-ryan-breaks-with-trump-on-arpaio-pardon-report
One may argue that Sheriff Arpaio broke the law himself in not exactly implementing a court order to stop profiling drivers that looked like Hispanic illegal aliens. If illegal aliens don't have legal driver's licenses that would provide probable cause of course, even so the Obama administration went to great lengths to allow global corporate to flood the nation with illegal, cheap workers to replace American ad hoc union wage-labor value.
In the end, if Sheriff Arapio broke a legal court order-and that is not certain depending upon several other legal questions, he acted out civil disobedience to support a majority opinion that illegal aliens should not be given easy entry into the United States. In my opinion civil disobedience to reinforce a majority opinion has greater moral claim that civil disobedience to reinforce a minority opinion. The judiciary has forced many legal finding in recent years upon the U.S. public that went counter to popular opinion. In a democracy one must ask how far a majority should go to let a judiciary dictate to it the political and social development of the nation based on constitutional constructivism.
http://thehill.com/homenews/house/348129-ryan-breaks-with-trump-on-arpaio-pardon-report
