The U.S. Supreme Court decided long ago (1977) that it is lawful for Nazi's wearing swastikas to March in public. So I wonder why the public seems so eager to use violence to prevent alt-right wingers from meeting and marching in public?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Socialist_Party_of_America_v._Village_of_Skokie
Even the U.N.- and organization to which real democracy of its member states is rather illusory- has 'urged the U.S. Government to reject racial hatred and violence'. When President Trump did that criticizing both sides of the Charlottesville affair he was pervasively criticized for not just attacking the alt-right as aggressively as did the alt-left.
Last I knew a fight requires at least two parties. Without the surge of the alt-left to Charlottesville to confront and intimidate if possible the alt-right meeting their lawfully there would have been no conflict. Boston- a center of alt-left activity had a vast left-wing surge of counter-demonstrators to suppress a lawful alt-right event.
It's not o.k. to just hose down the nazi-boys with a tommy gun, nor for that matter to use grenades if the alt-left show up to create violence. Fundamentally the lunatic right and the lunatic left each should expect to demonstrate legally without an army of counter-demonstrators showing up to create violence.
Everyone knows the media and democrat party are using the alt-right existence as a way to attack President Trump. The far-right have been around forever and have never amounted to anything nor been taken seriously by any right-thinking American. Letting the alt-right meet and speak without fear of violence from the vast numbers of left and alt-leftists is something the U.S.A. just has to do in order to remain the United States instead of the Soviet States of America.
It is easy to attack the Nazis- no one likes them, and it is also easy to overlook the fact that facism isn't just a low-brow aristocratic-socialist elitism; fascism is a method of interacting with others. Fascism is disregard for rational laws and using violence to eliminate political opposition. President Trump does need to have a fair and balanced- rational- approach to public affairs that the Democrat party lacks.
http://www.un.org/apps/news/story.asp?NewsID=57399#.WZ3VlnWGPeQ UN expects the U.S.A. 'to reject racist and violent events' (like a totalitarian regime would)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Socialist_Party_of_America_v._Village_of_Skokie
Even the U.N.- and organization to which real democracy of its member states is rather illusory- has 'urged the U.S. Government to reject racial hatred and violence'. When President Trump did that criticizing both sides of the Charlottesville affair he was pervasively criticized for not just attacking the alt-right as aggressively as did the alt-left.
Last I knew a fight requires at least two parties. Without the surge of the alt-left to Charlottesville to confront and intimidate if possible the alt-right meeting their lawfully there would have been no conflict. Boston- a center of alt-left activity had a vast left-wing surge of counter-demonstrators to suppress a lawful alt-right event.
It's not o.k. to just hose down the nazi-boys with a tommy gun, nor for that matter to use grenades if the alt-left show up to create violence. Fundamentally the lunatic right and the lunatic left each should expect to demonstrate legally without an army of counter-demonstrators showing up to create violence.
Everyone knows the media and democrat party are using the alt-right existence as a way to attack President Trump. The far-right have been around forever and have never amounted to anything nor been taken seriously by any right-thinking American. Letting the alt-right meet and speak without fear of violence from the vast numbers of left and alt-leftists is something the U.S.A. just has to do in order to remain the United States instead of the Soviet States of America.
It is easy to attack the Nazis- no one likes them, and it is also easy to overlook the fact that facism isn't just a low-brow aristocratic-socialist elitism; fascism is a method of interacting with others. Fascism is disregard for rational laws and using violence to eliminate political opposition. President Trump does need to have a fair and balanced- rational- approach to public affairs that the Democrat party lacks.
http://www.un.org/apps/news/story.asp?NewsID=57399#.WZ3VlnWGPeQ UN expects the U.S.A. 'to reject racist and violent events' (like a totalitarian regime would)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution
