In an era of planetary over-population will the U.S. Supreme Court vote to end the natural truth of heterosexual marriage in order to obfuscate social history and convert social reality into a mode appropriate for an egressing era of Corporate Imperialism?
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-03-05/from-goldman-to-google-companies-back-gay-marriage-in-supreme-court-brief
Though there are innumerable ways two adults might encumber themselves legal with contracts the homosexual movement has set their target on expropriating marriage for themselves redistributing all of the benefits designed by legislators to support heterosexual reproduction and child rearing. Business ironically supports the idea of redistribution of legal privileges though is generally in opposition to the redistribution of wealth (because the benefits here are in the public sector).
In order to have a society where homosexuals might legally approach male youth as if they were girls and with legal dope create a more stoned and stupid society more jellyfish-like for purposes of Corporate power and population reduction the Court may choose to outlaw heterosexual marriage among the 50 states.
Erasing social tradition and history; forcing new vinegar into old wine skins, homosexual marriages and divorces will debase the social currency of marriage and the meaning of marriage. It will become a term that describes a temporary dyadic bonding relationship rather than a union of genes and a synthetic recombination in progeny. That is a defeat of a very important political right of individuals against large imperial, corporate or government powers. Terminating the meaning of marriage-the historical facts of heterosexual marriage categorically violates the privacy of marriage and family. It erases that sacred personal bonding and replaces it with cheap social legal dyads with no necessary relationship to potential for reproduction. The era of transjennered proles under imperial power like stoned sardines in the U.S. public can is the sorry evolution the ill-informed of D.C. and Boston lust after.
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-03-05/from-goldman-to-google-companies-back-gay-marriage-in-supreme-court-brief
Though there are innumerable ways two adults might encumber themselves legal with contracts the homosexual movement has set their target on expropriating marriage for themselves redistributing all of the benefits designed by legislators to support heterosexual reproduction and child rearing. Business ironically supports the idea of redistribution of legal privileges though is generally in opposition to the redistribution of wealth (because the benefits here are in the public sector).
In order to have a society where homosexuals might legally approach male youth as if they were girls and with legal dope create a more stoned and stupid society more jellyfish-like for purposes of Corporate power and population reduction the Court may choose to outlaw heterosexual marriage among the 50 states.
Erasing social tradition and history; forcing new vinegar into old wine skins, homosexual marriages and divorces will debase the social currency of marriage and the meaning of marriage. It will become a term that describes a temporary dyadic bonding relationship rather than a union of genes and a synthetic recombination in progeny. That is a defeat of a very important political right of individuals against large imperial, corporate or government powers. Terminating the meaning of marriage-the historical facts of heterosexual marriage categorically violates the privacy of marriage and family. It erases that sacred personal bonding and replaces it with cheap social legal dyads with no necessary relationship to potential for reproduction. The era of transjennered proles under imperial power like stoned sardines in the U.S. public can is the sorry evolution the ill-informed of D.C. and Boston lust after.
No comments:
Post a Comment