Excellent article; it explains something of Naka's method. That game vs Anand is a work of art. I wonder though if fluid dynamics-especially Columb's law, while capable of serving as a metaphor for the flow and velocity of characteristics of money, isn't more suitable for chess positions and power applications such as Naka's in the games above.
About 70% of Wall Street trades are in some way essentially quantitative computer generated speed-of-light transactions. Funny thing about computers and algorithms is that they don't care much about global warming spoiled as they are with super-cooled and costly air-conditioning temperature regulation systems. An exception might be that in a computer's cold-blooded logic it might search for ways to profit from global warming increase. It is risky to trade against the quants anytime for they might spot vulnerabilities in the soft underbelly of the market and make a killing suddenly sinking one's own investment.
Externalities to one's game strategy such as may be lurking on the Q-side are more hidden in the real world from the view of trading stockfish/sharkfish schools.
