Magnetic fields exist for the Earth and many other solar system bodies--so why not use electro-magnetic fields to capture photons in order to produce energy for powering microwave ovens or to boost off-whirld electro-magnetic accelerated space journey units? I believe the conundrum is in the pudding, or the lack of it, and whip cream sufficient to make photon field collectors out of planetary-sized magnetic fields. I wish these scientists would get with it! What sort of solar voltaic field paradigm could be created?
Seriously though, after reading today the first article below on another research development for making electricity from solar photons I was reminded of how fine it would have been if as an adult if I had afforded more time for continuing scientific and philosophical researches. There should be some method to harvest solar and stellar photons in large fields to convert the energy to useful electrical potential for very nominal cost--actually for collecting the potential energy and narrowly applying it to self-interest.
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/02/100212172537.htm?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed:+sciencedaily+(ScienceDaily:+Latest+Science+News)&utm_content=Google+Feedfetcher
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromagnetic_field
An electro-magnetic accelerator or linear magnetic accelrator would accelerate a space journey unit at speed in relation to the mass of the unit to travel and the amount of energy activated sequentially on-line. To accelerate slow enough for survival of humans energy is only gradually added until at higher speed increased sub-6 G acceleration accumutively has reached a very high speed.
With a technology to shape electro-magnetic fields and to energize them with captured photons accelerators of sufficient size to allow velocities of a significant portion of the speed of light could be achieved.
Electromagnetic projectile accelerator
United States Patent 4432333 --
"Electromagnetic projectile accelerator comprising stationary coreless coils arranged in a row thus forming a tube. On the interior wall surface of said tube electrically opposite poled plates are mounted establishing an electric field.
The magnetic projectile moving through the said electric field generates an alternating switching mode in the respective electromagnetic coils whereby the acceleration of the projectile within the tube is performed."

14 February 2010
12 February 2010
Romans Invaded Western Europe in Retaliation; So Did the U.S. Invade Afghanistan
Rush Limbaugh gave an opinion about fairness and unfairness in society today. He gave as an example the Roman invasion of western Europe instead of Eastern Europe as occurring because of the easy geographic terrain to the west instead of more challenging to the right for Eastern Europe. Geography is 'not fair', and it was simply fate of happenstance that led the Romans to choose the easy way to a sure win. I disagree and will write about that later in this article.
The more important point is that the idea that life is not fair is used as a veiled reasoning in support of a conservative concentration of wealth and aristocratic disequilibrium to the advantage of a rich minority over poor masses. The classic battle since Edmund Burke of the masses to have a fair financial posture in society with a limit on the range of disparity between the rich and poor--say a one-hundred fold difference in annual income, in this global corporatism dominated political era is seriously challenged.
The reason for the difficulty in keeping a sound liberal bearing in the modern environment is that the classical liberal battle was muddied by the rise of socialism. Thus today the argument in the United States is largely between Conservative Corporatists and Liberal socialist; actual liberalism without socialism has faded away from the public viewing screen, and the recent Supreme Court decision to not limit Corporate political advertising spending because that would violate free speech will make it more difficult to recover the ancient liberal cause to resist exploitation by aristocracy. Paradoxical Adam Smith actually sought to liberate individuals of the middle and lower classes from the dominating power of aristocracy in the business and trade environment. Corporatism through networking and the concentration of wealth has restored the conservative aristocratic domination over society; A sort of Intron Oil of the political genome has evolved over Wall Street's Oval Office.
So Rush Limbaugh as the largest corporate sycophantic broadcaster of an independent sort, naturally enough supports corporatism as the embodiment of capitalism. Implicitly the political propaganda required to resist socialism and extol the virtue of unfairness in nature, politics and society is a defense of an aristocratic, natural right to rule over the masses.
Mass market aristocrats are today's Nietzschian supermen and women ruling over docile, raving dwellers of the lowlands. Not mentioned is that in a wild, unfair environment, the masses have a right to choose democracy, to limit the size of corporations to 2000 workers and staff-- so none concentrate too much wealth, and to limit the number of corporations that may be bought in to by any individual to just three--also to limit the concentration of political power and wealth.
In Adam Smith’s day--also that of the revolutionary founders of the United States, the aristocracy was simply royal whereas today they are simply rich. Modern social revolutionaries in support of renormalized smaller scale national capitalism and against the authoritarianism of corporatism and socialism ought to take the most practical measures required to create a free society for the modern world. The difficulty is that it requires ingenuity, intelligence and more mass education--while corporate supporters of socially fiscal stratified conservatism have unlimited advertising budgets as they rightly should. The problem is not in free speech but in the enslaved minds of American politicians.
Some have speculated upon the causality of Imperial Roman invasion of western Europe rather than Eastern Europe. It is held by some that geographical convenience of the comparative avenue of military ingress between Western and Eastern Europe led the Roman leadership to choose the easy western route over the Alps instead of the more challenging barriers to Eastern Europe. The concept is of course wrong.
The Roman invasions of Western Europe and of North Africa were simple challenge/response dialectics following the Toynbean historical cycles. Roman invasions of Western Europe and of the North African region followed invasions by the Carthaginians of North Africa and Germanic and Viking peoples of Western Europe of Italy.
The Carthaginian war by the populous and in particular under the military leadership of Hannibal who invaded Italy by way of Spain and the Alps led to the battle of Cannae. Hannibal lost his vision in one eye while waiting at the threshold of victory over the Romans for resupply from recalcitrant citizens of Carthage. The delay fundamentally turned the tide of battle to defeat for the Carthaginians.
If the Romans had any need of instruction about defending their nation against foreign invaders after the war with Hannibal conclude ding with Scipio Africanus ( “I am convinced that life is 10% what happens to me and 96% how I react to it. “) sacking, burning and salting Carthage in Africa, it would have been provided by the invasion in two primary waves by hundreds of thousands of Northerners determined to access the fabulous wealth of Rome. Civilization and its storehouses of wealth attack the attack of the uncivilized like flies not uncommonly.
The Romans sent the same general--Marius--the uncle of Julius Caesar--out to defend against the Germanic tribes twice. The first was a battle at Marseille in which 100,000 northerners were slaughtered to fertilized the fields of agriculture for years as an unintended consequence, and the second produced the same result after the intimidating northerners slid naked down the Alpine slopes in a different route of invasions. The Italians did gain blonde bloodlines in more quantity as a result of the attack.
The Romans also determined to invade the homeland of the barbarians that had sought to plunder Rome. Julius Caesar and his tenth legion as well as others took Britain and Germany as far as the Rhine-even venturing a little beyond. The policy of the United States in attacking Iraq and Afghanistan roughly follows the same logic--that worked fine a couple thousand years ago and today it is perhaps obsolete in several respects as a practical reply to the 9-11 attack.
The 9-11 attack was created by several U.S. trained in Afghanistan former mufsidoon comprising an international guerilla organization. The occupation of Afghanistan to install a western friendly government that would not in the future harbor any anti-American terrorists was an asymmetric financial expense-and the terrorists were a fluid international element escaping to other regions.
One may adduce several reason for the causality of wars of civilization against barbarians, yet without a viable economic foundation in the barbarian nation to be invaded that could sustain a long term occupation by the reactionary imperial power the effort isn’t terribly practical. We read of the invasion of Mesopotamia by the rich Roman General Cassius in pursuit of the Parthian and the consequent annihilation of his legion beyond the Euphrates. We remember the defeat of the decadent Alexandrian empire’s Seleucid Empire in Israel by Judas Maccabeus the Jewish leader. It is obvious that the reason western Roman imperial holdings were more lasting in western Europe than in North Africa was the comparative fertility of each region as well as the comparative freedom from rival civilized power the Romans experienced in holding western Europe rather than in Mesopotamia.
Central Eurasia presents many challenges in security for the United States comparable in several respects to those encountered by the Roman Empire. Securing frontier defense outposts might be practical in Afghanistan, securing an entire nation and freeing a very populous Pakistan and Indian subcontinent as elate middle east from a variety of improvisational and ad hoc anti-American terrorist organizations is perhaps not possible through military investment and badly planned and inefficient civil investment through local ‘friendly’ government administration. The U.S. Government has serious difficulties in planning rational ecological economic investment in the U.S. economy itself much less in more barbarous or if not that at least more underdeveloped Central Asia. Perhaps the Obama administration will get a few Home Depot and Wal-Mart Stores to go up before exiting the area with less a trillion dollars give or take a few pennies.
The more important point is that the idea that life is not fair is used as a veiled reasoning in support of a conservative concentration of wealth and aristocratic disequilibrium to the advantage of a rich minority over poor masses. The classic battle since Edmund Burke of the masses to have a fair financial posture in society with a limit on the range of disparity between the rich and poor--say a one-hundred fold difference in annual income, in this global corporatism dominated political era is seriously challenged.
The reason for the difficulty in keeping a sound liberal bearing in the modern environment is that the classical liberal battle was muddied by the rise of socialism. Thus today the argument in the United States is largely between Conservative Corporatists and Liberal socialist; actual liberalism without socialism has faded away from the public viewing screen, and the recent Supreme Court decision to not limit Corporate political advertising spending because that would violate free speech will make it more difficult to recover the ancient liberal cause to resist exploitation by aristocracy. Paradoxical Adam Smith actually sought to liberate individuals of the middle and lower classes from the dominating power of aristocracy in the business and trade environment. Corporatism through networking and the concentration of wealth has restored the conservative aristocratic domination over society; A sort of Intron Oil of the political genome has evolved over Wall Street's Oval Office.
So Rush Limbaugh as the largest corporate sycophantic broadcaster of an independent sort, naturally enough supports corporatism as the embodiment of capitalism. Implicitly the political propaganda required to resist socialism and extol the virtue of unfairness in nature, politics and society is a defense of an aristocratic, natural right to rule over the masses.
Mass market aristocrats are today's Nietzschian supermen and women ruling over docile, raving dwellers of the lowlands. Not mentioned is that in a wild, unfair environment, the masses have a right to choose democracy, to limit the size of corporations to 2000 workers and staff-- so none concentrate too much wealth, and to limit the number of corporations that may be bought in to by any individual to just three--also to limit the concentration of political power and wealth.
In Adam Smith’s day--also that of the revolutionary founders of the United States, the aristocracy was simply royal whereas today they are simply rich. Modern social revolutionaries in support of renormalized smaller scale national capitalism and against the authoritarianism of corporatism and socialism ought to take the most practical measures required to create a free society for the modern world. The difficulty is that it requires ingenuity, intelligence and more mass education--while corporate supporters of socially fiscal stratified conservatism have unlimited advertising budgets as they rightly should. The problem is not in free speech but in the enslaved minds of American politicians.
Some have speculated upon the causality of Imperial Roman invasion of western Europe rather than Eastern Europe. It is held by some that geographical convenience of the comparative avenue of military ingress between Western and Eastern Europe led the Roman leadership to choose the easy western route over the Alps instead of the more challenging barriers to Eastern Europe. The concept is of course wrong.
The Roman invasions of Western Europe and of North Africa were simple challenge/response dialectics following the Toynbean historical cycles. Roman invasions of Western Europe and of the North African region followed invasions by the Carthaginians of North Africa and Germanic and Viking peoples of Western Europe of Italy.
The Carthaginian war by the populous and in particular under the military leadership of Hannibal who invaded Italy by way of Spain and the Alps led to the battle of Cannae. Hannibal lost his vision in one eye while waiting at the threshold of victory over the Romans for resupply from recalcitrant citizens of Carthage. The delay fundamentally turned the tide of battle to defeat for the Carthaginians.
If the Romans had any need of instruction about defending their nation against foreign invaders after the war with Hannibal conclude ding with Scipio Africanus ( “I am convinced that life is 10% what happens to me and 96% how I react to it. “) sacking, burning and salting Carthage in Africa, it would have been provided by the invasion in two primary waves by hundreds of thousands of Northerners determined to access the fabulous wealth of Rome. Civilization and its storehouses of wealth attack the attack of the uncivilized like flies not uncommonly.
The Romans sent the same general--Marius--the uncle of Julius Caesar--out to defend against the Germanic tribes twice. The first was a battle at Marseille in which 100,000 northerners were slaughtered to fertilized the fields of agriculture for years as an unintended consequence, and the second produced the same result after the intimidating northerners slid naked down the Alpine slopes in a different route of invasions. The Italians did gain blonde bloodlines in more quantity as a result of the attack.
The Romans also determined to invade the homeland of the barbarians that had sought to plunder Rome. Julius Caesar and his tenth legion as well as others took Britain and Germany as far as the Rhine-even venturing a little beyond. The policy of the United States in attacking Iraq and Afghanistan roughly follows the same logic--that worked fine a couple thousand years ago and today it is perhaps obsolete in several respects as a practical reply to the 9-11 attack.
The 9-11 attack was created by several U.S. trained in Afghanistan former mufsidoon comprising an international guerilla organization. The occupation of Afghanistan to install a western friendly government that would not in the future harbor any anti-American terrorists was an asymmetric financial expense-and the terrorists were a fluid international element escaping to other regions.
One may adduce several reason for the causality of wars of civilization against barbarians, yet without a viable economic foundation in the barbarian nation to be invaded that could sustain a long term occupation by the reactionary imperial power the effort isn’t terribly practical. We read of the invasion of Mesopotamia by the rich Roman General Cassius in pursuit of the Parthian and the consequent annihilation of his legion beyond the Euphrates. We remember the defeat of the decadent Alexandrian empire’s Seleucid Empire in Israel by Judas Maccabeus the Jewish leader. It is obvious that the reason western Roman imperial holdings were more lasting in western Europe than in North Africa was the comparative fertility of each region as well as the comparative freedom from rival civilized power the Romans experienced in holding western Europe rather than in Mesopotamia.
Central Eurasia presents many challenges in security for the United States comparable in several respects to those encountered by the Roman Empire. Securing frontier defense outposts might be practical in Afghanistan, securing an entire nation and freeing a very populous Pakistan and Indian subcontinent as elate middle east from a variety of improvisational and ad hoc anti-American terrorist organizations is perhaps not possible through military investment and badly planned and inefficient civil investment through local ‘friendly’ government administration. The U.S. Government has serious difficulties in planning rational ecological economic investment in the U.S. economy itself much less in more barbarous or if not that at least more underdeveloped Central Asia. Perhaps the Obama administration will get a few Home Depot and Wal-Mart Stores to go up before exiting the area with less a trillion dollars give or take a few pennies.
11 February 2010
On the Revision/ Draft of my novel 'The St. Novilistricka Plan'
So after working a month on a revision of my first draft of The St. Novilstricka Plan' I deleted the work accidentally. scztf!
One minute I am carefully saving the file and later even backing it up, and then anon I discover that in working on two different files simultaneously I saved one in each project and got rid of the book's progress--ouch!
So I will post my first page, as sophomoric as it may seem, in order to have a copy somewhere in case the back up original version should become lost.
Page one of 'The St. Novilitricka Plan...(science fiction)
Chapter One
At the summit of Old Schlepleglaubt the wind was interminably cold and yet seemed stale fixed to geographic conformzones. In the valley below thermals brought little relief to stifling heat that parched the fallow ground. I enjoyed foraging for pinions growing at higher elevations of Subductor. Pinions are a rare healthy fresh food on this world. Global warming continued increasing even after responsible neo-sentients had gone under.
Lush and I watched a holo-image in the air over a natural rock bench. Research of Subductor's exopogenic overheated atmosphere by neo-sentient pollutions provided evidence of dittoed dooming at latitude and altitude of the viable biosphere. on the world. It was the extraction of knowledge from decayed worlds and my own analysis of the Earth chaos leading to apocalypse sub-prime that brought us to Subductor, for it also had experienced social brainlock.
"It's the way my second home world-the planet Earth developed it's own relationship to the eternal teleology Lush. Human nature was fundamentally evil and brought about its own social ruin. "
"I think that's saying quite a lot Patrick. How could human nature be socially evil and yet function as a continuum?"
"Our Lord Jesus Christ, and the prophets of God described the deterministic future history of the Earth and the way that would evolve as Apocalypse. The power of evil that exists in mankind is the same will as that of Satan-the most egregious evil spiritual power known. Humanity evolved Satan's will on Earth freely through it's nature. Competitive, striving, unconcerned about the real well-being of others--primates humanity groomed as champions of those it believed were powerful enough to destroy themselves. Conflict and consumption with pride are regarded as the highest values. Naturally that lead to global totalitarianism."
One minute I am carefully saving the file and later even backing it up, and then anon I discover that in working on two different files simultaneously I saved one in each project and got rid of the book's progress--ouch!
So I will post my first page, as sophomoric as it may seem, in order to have a copy somewhere in case the back up original version should become lost.
Page one of 'The St. Novilitricka Plan...(science fiction)
Chapter One
At the summit of Old Schlepleglaubt the wind was interminably cold and yet seemed stale fixed to geographic conformzones. In the valley below thermals brought little relief to stifling heat that parched the fallow ground. I enjoyed foraging for pinions growing at higher elevations of Subductor. Pinions are a rare healthy fresh food on this world. Global warming continued increasing even after responsible neo-sentients had gone under.
Lush and I watched a holo-image in the air over a natural rock bench. Research of Subductor's exopogenic overheated atmosphere by neo-sentient pollutions provided evidence of dittoed dooming at latitude and altitude of the viable biosphere. on the world. It was the extraction of knowledge from decayed worlds and my own analysis of the Earth chaos leading to apocalypse sub-prime that brought us to Subductor, for it also had experienced social brainlock.
"It's the way my second home world-the planet Earth developed it's own relationship to the eternal teleology Lush. Human nature was fundamentally evil and brought about its own social ruin. "
"I think that's saying quite a lot Patrick. How could human nature be socially evil and yet function as a continuum?"
"Our Lord Jesus Christ, and the prophets of God described the deterministic future history of the Earth and the way that would evolve as Apocalypse. The power of evil that exists in mankind is the same will as that of Satan-the most egregious evil spiritual power known. Humanity evolved Satan's will on Earth freely through it's nature. Competitive, striving, unconcerned about the real well-being of others--primates humanity groomed as champions of those it believed were powerful enough to destroy themselves. Conflict and consumption with pride are regarded as the highest values. Naturally that lead to global totalitarianism."
Sen. Scott Brown- G.O.P. Presidential Candidate vs. Obama in 2012?
Newly elected U.S. Senator from Massachusetts former state legislator Scott Brown can claim as much political experience as President Obama before being elected, and received 4% mention as the G.O.P. favorite in the next Presidential election.
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/dcnow/2010/02/brown-gop-presidency.html
The Republican Party should provide substantial political challenge to the Democratic incumbent, yet they need an ecologically minded U.S. nationalist candidate confident enough to challenge the globalists plundering America of its wealth and degrading the financial security of the middle and lower classes.
The next two years in the U.S. Senate will be the new Senator's tough graduate school of political management styling before he may be promoted to take a run at the big chair of ultimate U.S> political power in the Oval Office.
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/dcnow/2010/02/brown-gop-presidency.html
The Republican Party should provide substantial political challenge to the Democratic incumbent, yet they need an ecologically minded U.S. nationalist candidate confident enough to challenge the globalists plundering America of its wealth and degrading the financial security of the middle and lower classes.
The next two years in the U.S. Senate will be the new Senator's tough graduate school of political management styling before he may be promoted to take a run at the big chair of ultimate U.S> political power in the Oval Office.
Moon Base/Space Port Tech Cache Should Start to Compile
The moon is a good base-camp for off-whirld ventures and should be the practical, durable location of first-stage extra-terrestrial missions. Real space ships could be built easier on the moon than on Earth--it is just a preference to invest in foreign wars and training future terrorists abroad that makes an intelligent research and development mission unaffordable to the administration.
The Constellation-orion project was a basic way of restoring the moon access program. The administration should change and restore support for lunar development at least for ecological economic practice.
Ecological economic practices would create a biosphere where none exists.Oxygen may exist in lunar regolith.
http://www.sciencedaily.com/videos/2006/0207-back_to_the_moon.htm
There is good enough soil for planting on the Moon indoors. Mining machines can expand subsurface chambers that would be illuminated with fiber optic cables bringing sunlight to the underworld, while wire superconductors on the surface would contain electrons stored from organic solar voltaic capture during the day.
It is believed water ice may be stored in the subsurface soil and in craters of the south. A variety of ongoing Earth sourced projects from free enterprise and governments may be launched and received over the next few hundred years to the moon space-port and construction base.
http://www.eastfieldnews.com/2.6688/mining-the-moon-1.974765
The Constellation-orion project was a basic way of restoring the moon access program. The administration should change and restore support for lunar development at least for ecological economic practice.
Ecological economic practices would create a biosphere where none exists.Oxygen may exist in lunar regolith.
http://www.sciencedaily.com/videos/2006/0207-back_to_the_moon.htm
There is good enough soil for planting on the Moon indoors. Mining machines can expand subsurface chambers that would be illuminated with fiber optic cables bringing sunlight to the underworld, while wire superconductors on the surface would contain electrons stored from organic solar voltaic capture during the day.
It is believed water ice may be stored in the subsurface soil and in craters of the south. A variety of ongoing Earth sourced projects from free enterprise and governments may be launched and received over the next few hundred years to the moon space-port and construction base.
http://www.eastfieldnews.com/2.6688/mining-the-moon-1.974765
Tehran Claims 20% Enrichment of Uranium--Washington D.C. So Happy It Wet Itself
The Iranian President's claim of enriching Uranium in order to make medical grade uranium able to be upgraded through repeated distilleries to plutonium proof is a cause for continuing U.S. policy planning pouting. I feel the government's seemingly meaningless comments from Washington on the Iranian issue have little effect on Iranian policy--yet they condition the people of the United States to years of dire, looming auspices of the high country.
The administration could make the day of investors in conservative verbiage from politicians if they adopted more real-politik circumstances regarding Iran, Pakistan and others. At least NPR could abstain from reporting what could be private communications to Tehran. PR posturing is more proof of posturing than of effectiveness.
Since Washington policy is fundamentally to enrich a rich global corporatist crowd instead of the people of the United States, it argues about market access more so than a moon base or profound ecological economic restructuring or the need for good jobs for the perennially unemployed.
Washington's perennial anti-missile defenses/cancel missile defenses, sanctions that don't work and investment of trillions to train muslim militias in Afghanistan and Pakistan seem dubiously destined for success. I wish them luck and hope that peaceful nuclear non-proliferation is the future actualization of politics. In the meantime intelligent thought counts too as well as reactionary bluster.
The Department of Homosexual Militant Defense might recollect that if Satan is one's defender, then one has no defense. I marvel at the administration's insensitivity on international relations as a perennial theme. Walk softly and carry a big stick was good enough for Theodore Roosevelt.
The administration could make the day of investors in conservative verbiage from politicians if they adopted more real-politik circumstances regarding Iran, Pakistan and others. At least NPR could abstain from reporting what could be private communications to Tehran. PR posturing is more proof of posturing than of effectiveness.
Since Washington policy is fundamentally to enrich a rich global corporatist crowd instead of the people of the United States, it argues about market access more so than a moon base or profound ecological economic restructuring or the need for good jobs for the perennially unemployed.
Washington's perennial anti-missile defenses/cancel missile defenses, sanctions that don't work and investment of trillions to train muslim militias in Afghanistan and Pakistan seem dubiously destined for success. I wish them luck and hope that peaceful nuclear non-proliferation is the future actualization of politics. In the meantime intelligent thought counts too as well as reactionary bluster.
The Department of Homosexual Militant Defense might recollect that if Satan is one's defender, then one has no defense. I marvel at the administration's insensitivity on international relations as a perennial theme. Walk softly and carry a big stick was good enough for Theodore Roosevelt.
10 February 2010
Federal Government to Spend 79 million to Catch Chinese Carp
The ferocious Chinese Carp species seeking access to the Great Lakes and the tender prey that are salmonids require a guided $79 million dollar fishing research expedition to halt. A variety of mechanical methods to keep the carp from slipping through locks connecting the Lakes to the Illinois and Mississippi river drainage seem the best method now--especially since 'genetic material' of the carp was already discovered at the Lake Superior side crime scene.
Plainly it will be challenging to prevent little minnow carp from achieving the freedom of Lake Michigan easy pickings deli of native American fish. Maybe the Zebra muscles of the Lakes can go viral and lure the carp in close enough to snap their shell on them?
If experience at restoring Columbia River chinook salmon runs or keeping northern pike out of Alaskan rivers like the Susitna are a guide to federal failures at managing fisheries, we can count on the fact that someone eventually will take a bag of carp minnows as live bait in a plastic bad from the infested rivers and release them into Lake Michigan at the end of the day.
Rather than a mechanical solution, there must be some kind of species specific anti-Asian carp element found to neutralize or terminate the carp life cycle even if it achieves domination in the Lake first. With the profusion of D.N.A. research it would seem that a biological control technique should be discovered. Because that area of interest is of a concern--anything methodically applied should have zero possibility of harmful unintended consequences for any other species including the human race.
It is not impossible that a fish bio-war may be declared by the U.S. Government after the mechanical defense at the Chicago River front is defeated by the clever, ruthless carp. If the problem was the fundamental thrashing of the health of the national ecosystem by corporatism and government design, it would be fair enough to blame the voracious fish for their disrespect for American trout and salmon.
http://www.newsmeat.com/news/meat.php?articleId=66778888&channelId=2951&buyerId=newsmeatcom&buid=3281
Plainly it will be challenging to prevent little minnow carp from achieving the freedom of Lake Michigan easy pickings deli of native American fish. Maybe the Zebra muscles of the Lakes can go viral and lure the carp in close enough to snap their shell on them?
If experience at restoring Columbia River chinook salmon runs or keeping northern pike out of Alaskan rivers like the Susitna are a guide to federal failures at managing fisheries, we can count on the fact that someone eventually will take a bag of carp minnows as live bait in a plastic bad from the infested rivers and release them into Lake Michigan at the end of the day.
Rather than a mechanical solution, there must be some kind of species specific anti-Asian carp element found to neutralize or terminate the carp life cycle even if it achieves domination in the Lake first. With the profusion of D.N.A. research it would seem that a biological control technique should be discovered. Because that area of interest is of a concern--anything methodically applied should have zero possibility of harmful unintended consequences for any other species including the human race.
It is not impossible that a fish bio-war may be declared by the U.S. Government after the mechanical defense at the Chicago River front is defeated by the clever, ruthless carp. If the problem was the fundamental thrashing of the health of the national ecosystem by corporatism and government design, it would be fair enough to blame the voracious fish for their disrespect for American trout and salmon.
http://www.newsmeat.com/news/meat.php?articleId=66778888&channelId=2951&buyerId=newsmeatcom&buid=3281
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
-
It is a rather amusing fact that some political elites didn't get the candidate they wanted this year. Ordinary Americans have experie...
-
Upgrading standard hard-plastic Halloween masks with eye covering and nose and mouth filters probably would substantially reduce the odds of...
