Select Democrats are continuing the divide and conquer approach to political power by making a video urging active duty military to not obey illegal orders (from President Trump).The implication is that the President is ordering the military to perform illegal actions, and continues to do so after court decisions to order the action to stop. Neither the President nor the Courts benefit from Super-intervention by select Democrats admonishing military members. Levering the military undermines the trust in the executive, the military and government itself. President Trump wasn't wrong in suggesting the Democrat Party is flirting with sedition. After all they do favor policies that are harmful to the nation and of more value to Mexico and Europe than Americans rather often.
The military are already aware they can be court martialed for following plainly illegal orders. For members of the national guard to follow the President's orders to deploy in order to security the safety of federal officials or to secure the safety of American citizens is more of a legal issue; a technical one, for the judiciary to decide, rather than individual soldiers themselves. Placing an onerous burden of jurisprudence upon soldiers to litigate thorny legal issues in their minds and make a choice to obey an order or not is wrong. That in itself is not sedulous, although it does strive to disrupt the Executives and Judicial role in domestic affairs and infuse distrust and chaos amidst the military.
President Trump was accused of leading an insurrection against the U.S. Government by the Democrat (ic) Party and must relish the opportunity to return the favor to Democrats. It would not be too surprising if Congressional Republicans established a committee of some sort to investigate Democrat party affiliation with foreign governments of Europe and with Mexico to discover hidden relations to drug cartels and those seeking to continue war and transfer hundreds of billions of dollars to the corrupt government of Ukraine for war against Russia. Republicans though don't have a total war upon political opposition as their political modus vivendi.
NBC reported however that Trump "suggested that Democrats should be killed"- in a libelous parsing of what the President actually said; a textbook case of fake news. Trump simply referred to the on the books legal penalty for sedition.
I am for free enterprise and democracy with private property yet global communism could naturally evolve in at least one possible future. That would be in a system where A.I. is so far smarter than humans in general intelligence- not just large language models, and robots ubiquitous and cheap, and resources limited or in need of critical global management including near space resources, that A.I. rules the Earth and allocates to everyone "each according to his or her needs", and drafts people for whatever purpose General A.I. control requires "from each according to his ability". Private property would be abolished and the state (the A.I.) would manage all human political and economy interests with absolute power- this is the first principle of an Artificial Intelligence system of government that coincides with communist Utopian goals.
Microplastics are pervasive in the ecosphere today as a consequence of a century of plastics use economically. Plastics break down and become microplastic and are ingested by humans via numerous vectors. There are about seven grams of microplastics in every American's brain; and that affects health and possibly even petrification of thinking about environmental problems leading to denial they exist lol (that is a political joke).
Recently research has found a possible way to purge a human body of the accumulation of microplastics by ingestion of an element of broccoli named Sulforaphane. Following are videos on health problems caused by microplastics and one of the possible remedies.
The political split between President Trump and Marjorie Taylor Greene as ended her effectiveness as a Republican politician. She should seize the day and convert to the green side of the force and lead a high tech Green Party environmental, peace and prosperity party campaign for the Presidency in 2028. Trump has the audacity to try impossible things like being President and ending the Ukraine war; so should she.
If World War Three occurs, digital currency will have zero value due to destruction of the Internet Of course the Pentagon may have hardened internal connections that would survive in some upgraded form of DARPANET. Maybe the military-industrial complex will have their own Pentagon digital currency, I believe that at some point when trillions are invested in digital currency some evil genius will find a way to wipe it out- perhaps via e.m.g pulses globally, and bet futures on regular currencies short selling all the digital.
The next war will bring people to have no electricity or internet. There are already a zillion satellites and technology to end telecommunications. Only war hardened networks like the original DARPANET would stand much of a chance of survival, at least until hit by nuclear weapons. There are other advances possible. I am sure that someday quantum teleportation of entangled particles that can develop after quantum computers are built in orbit a square mile in size so they have superconduction and don't need cooling- which is the main limit to their size- someone will discover a way to enter located net facilities and redistribute the wealth of encrypted digital currencies or at least destroy them with some kind of directed energy quantum entanglement/quantum tunneling invasion.
It sounds like science fiction and yet real scientists already exist in a science fiction like world since they are far advanced beyond the knowledge of average people. I graduated as a programmer and systems analyst 45 years ago from a tech school and never worked in the field; preferring a philosophical and Christian life course yet still consider the field with detachment and awareness that every mathematical puzzle can be solved by someone eventually- including quantum computers of the future. Consider the financial incentive of people to learn to infiltrate and affect the wealth of digital currencies via destruction or theft. Money is the prime worldly motivator second possibly only to life and health of oneself and important others.
I am not too concerned about it really. I am poor and can finish life that way without much concern. I also have a philosophical reservation about capitalism. Capital increases faster than wages you know so wealth always over-concentrates and people become oppressed by a tiny minority that own 95 percent of everything. I believe the wealthy should be taxed enough that they cannot concentrate wealth- just earn the wealth they can use in their own lifetime, and have the maximum amount of wealth capped at a certain percent of the total value of the national economy so they don't have so much political power. I support free enterprise, yet capitalism needs limits so it doesn't repress competition even in business.
I hate the idea of people not working and just collecting rents and capital gains with fairly easy investments that make working a farce- especially the wealth of illegal drug sales. It is exceedingly corrupting. In a way the capital investment market needs to be like a Ponzi scheme itself at some point when A.I. can guide everyone’s investments. That sort of natural selection is a crazy way to choose to build actual businesses in the real world.
The present economy is the one that brought every American to have a teaspoon of microplastics in their brains. I am for progress and invention yet regard the present economic structure as maladapted and obsolete in regard to its fundamental structure being an inherited growth of classical economics that is not rational in regard to environmental and demographic elements. I don't believe market forces substitute for rational, critical political design and political economy that works for everyone. 😀
There are substantial differences between W.W. II and the Ukraine conflict about 80 years later obviously. Logistics, weapons technology, communication and political configurations have changed a lot. Here is a video with more background on the German military posture compared to that of the American during World War Two.
One might learn something from that regarding the military posture of the United States today with so much manufacturing having shifted offshore and the industrial base half located in China and elsewhere. Solar rechargeable electric vehicles perhaps with auxiliary fuel cells may be a sustainable mass produced military vehicle for foreign militaries that reduce cost and reliance on fuel logistics down the road. Already the rise of drones and solar-power AI drones are changing the realities of equipment that might survive mass air and ground attack from drones. Fuel supply vehicles would be especially difficult to defend making self-fueling military vehicles de rigeur in the future.
A new generation is making the mistake of believing that socialism works better than free enterprise for a modern nation state. The gross concentration of wealth is a fact that can be corrected with democracy; socialism isn’t at all necessary or useful. Instead it is an obsolete, 19th century approach to rectifying problems of industrial era Darwinian capitalism’s extremes of England. Socialism is taking over the Democrat Party basically because the party leadership hasn't good ideas.
New York and Seattle elected socialist mayors (Mamdani and Wilson) in effect attempting to roll back the tide of the end of the Cold war with the defunct Soviet Union that was a movement for free enterprise in the United States and across the Soviet Union. Soviets recognized their ineffective delivery of goods and services to the public in that great 20th century experiment at providing fairness and social equality to the masses. I believe youth don't know history well or learn from its mistakes. A friend said that youth just want to fix what feels 'broken'.
Repeating the same wrong paths may be a traditional failure, yet with Youtube existing to popularize mass education it should be more avoidable now then before. Some say socialism doesn't mean what it used to; that all socialists want today is free bus service and a few items they desire; a living wage, health care, housing. Mayor Mamdani said he wouldn't mind government running grocery stores- I believe the latter would create Soviet style groceries radically under-stocked with a few limp vegetables and a line up for ten day old bread. Politicians don't understand the micro-dynamics of operations of such businesses nor global product acquisition and economics of putting stuff on shelves (i.e. 100 kinds of energy drinks or one, 20 varieties and flavors of yogurt or two, canned ham in ten flavors or one; from Denmark or Chinese owned pig farms in the Midwest etc)..
Even Communist China following the opening President Nixon and Sect. Of State Kissinger eventually discovered that Chinese districts that were given the right to run their own affairs radically outperformed comparable socialist, centrally run economic districts. China opted to move toward increasing free enterprise because it is simply far more productive. https://www.coursera.org/learn/econtransform1
It is a mistake to fail to learn from history and reinforce policy that are proven failures like socialism. Democracy continues to be the best political system obviously, and free enterprise is far and away the most economically productive, yet Democracy only works if people have intelligence enough to use it to deliver what the masses of voters want-within the system. There are numerous challenges to the economy, environment and well being of the nation and it’s people that can be rectified with intelligent legislation rather easily. Advocating a different system simply because politicians have no competent ideas to advance through democracy is unfortunate.
Frank Zappa pointed out that elections are the entertainment division of the military-industrial complex. One might believe that today about Germany and England in light of their support for the Ukraine war- a war that could and should be settled peacefully with Russia recovering its land historically on the East bank of the Dnepro River. The nation should have secure borders and only legal residents, citizens and tourists along with workers with appropriate visas living here; then wages normal rise. Supply and demand counts in wages as well as prices. So it is rather disingenuous for socialist mayors of Seattle and New York to support illegal immigration and better wages for legal workers simultaneously because they are counter-cyclical wage factors.
Americans tend to be ignorant of political philosophy. Because the global conversation for the 20th century was about capitalism vs socialism or communism, many Americans continue to view the world in those lenses. Corporatism, plutocracy, corporatocracy and the reality of globalization and digital currencies over borders are not things the average political philosophy of Americans enter. Any sort of political change or policy that shifts financial advantage from a tiny minority of the rich to the masses through democratic means is immediately labeled socialism even though it is not. The means of production need be privately held and operated for effectiveness. Public policy about what tax levels to set and what to do with the money is a part of the right of democracy the wealthy hate.
Socialism is a loser’s political choice and an effective misdirection of public focus. Creating public, government operated clinics for the poor and letting the middle class and rich by their own health insurance was a better way than Nixon/Romney/Obama care to provide effect health for all Americans. Food stamps are great for the hungry, yet would obviously be stupid for the middle class and rich. Health care is a similar necessary for almost everyone service. In the case of health care because the skill of physicians is critical, in addition to pharmaceuticals and medical equipment and technical staff, it is practical to create clinics with free health care for those that can’t afford it and are legally in the nation. It would be a terrible thing if government bureaucrats were the ones running the pharmaceutical industry I would think; they might invest billions in developing new ‘salt tricks’.
Capital increase faster than wages, and like the acceleration of space-time may increase at a scalar pace if uncorrected. Adequate taxation to stop gross social stratification and gross lass asymmetry is necessary function of a democracy that would remain one rather than follow a version of Aristotle or Toynbee's historical cycles to a bad end. The Democrat Party has been notably ineffective or unable to increase taxes on the rich, to pay off public debt or to provide practical legislation to employ those unemployed longest with tax incentives, make patents affordable for everyone (as well as copyright), realistically solve the homeless problem with innovative physical approaches rather than government spending directly to buy housing rentals with increased public debt.
The nation will face greater challenges ahead from worker displacement by AI and robots. Large stores even now could replace most workers with wheeled robots and good systems analysis. Robots work 24 hours a day seven days a week and are more reliable than human workers. That is a real challenge Democrats cannot address at all with socialism. AI will make even lawyers too costly for many citizens. I would expect that soon socialist mayors themselves may buy AI packed robots to serve as public defenders for the poor in courtrooms one the tech and software exceed that of average law school graduates. Lawyers, unlike chess grandmasters that lose to AI or VR chess engines every time, cannot exist in a separate league of their own free of competition from AI attorney engines.
