Speaker Nancy Pelosi wants investigation of funding of critics of the mosque 'build it and they will come' strategy near ground zero.
The Democrat Speaker of the House is so completely aloof that she has no concept why the mosque is a political issue or concerns Americans all over the United States.
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-20014003-503544.html
She also doesn't recognize that its not 'just Republicans' and pros criticizing the onerous plan to build a mega-mosque near ground zero. Some of us are broke and homeless people hoping for a new congress and new President that know how to create jobs right away rather than 'step by step, inch by inch, slowly' until halted by the next crisis and economic crash. We don't want politicians that kow tow to Mecca whenever oil goes up in price.
We have no faith in the Democrat economic plan for jobless recovery, as the approach of freezing weather is over the edge of space-time a month or two. Some believe that the Democrat sucking up to a victorious encroachment of a Muslim presentation of power near ground zero--the swollen bully's temple of doom is more of a silk-stocking kind of bureaucracy and corporate security with its head up the direction of national decline.
This is not an issue about religious freedom Speaker Pelosi. Muslims are free to build Mosques in New Jersey with the Giants and other sports franchises. This is simply an issue about political and economic power, war and peace, decency and justice, respect for those devastated by Muslim killers from abroad and even future security of New York and the United States.
This is not a local issue only as you have offered as you opinion. New York is not just local. Many Americans have interests in N.Y.C. The three trillion dollars spent to invest in two protracted wars to hunt Muslim terrorists that destroyed the WTC has cascaded poverty for many of us American self-employed house repainters. We wonder what planet you really are from Speaker Nancy Pelosi. An investigation should be made on your source funding for transportation to Earth from that distant galaxy so far away.
Some of us would criticize the construction of a mosque so long as we had internet access of wireless providers or public libraries even if we avoided starvation living on bannock bread. One can get recurrent food poisoning from eating unrefrigerated baloney, yet that is not more sickening that the House Speaker's blatant ignorance of the sentiments of the people of the United States on building a mosque near ground zero.
18 August 2010
What You See is What You Get in Presidential Candidates
U.S.A. Electing Underqualified Presidents Deserves What it Gets (Debt, Crisis, Eco-Decline etc.)
Presidents Eisenhower and Reagan were the last two fully qualified nationally integrated Presidents. Each was well known and their political ideas published before taking office. The nation knew what to expect from each individual. In recent years the nation has elected local governors or state politicians promoted too rapidly.
Presidents Obama, Bush, Clinton or Carter hadn't a well-developed public economic and environmental platform in which they worked for several years before running for office. If the public simply elects any modestly articulate candidate able to read a teleprompter, a candidate that has not given serious though to development of actual economic and ecological policy that works for many years—they get an unknown untested President happy just to be President. Such Presidents may not really be up to the task of national leadership.
George H.W. Bush was a phi beta kappa in economics and famous for calling Reaganomics 'voodoo economics'. We find other flaws in President Bush I besides economics, that might have faded in to history without too much problem if not followed up with Clintonomics as the actualizer of 'The New World Order'. The protracted rush to concentrate wealth for global financial elites and to liquidate U.S. nationalism and home owning security led down disastrous courses that have yet to play out.
Richard Nixon was brilliant yet flawed—and could not get elected to the U.S. Senate in California. Though he levered his way onto the Eisenhower administration with that Checker’s speech, he was far less public and known over time before taking office Ronald Regan who as a Democrat supported Eisenhower in the 1952 and 1956 Presidential campaigns.
The nation knew much about Ronald Reagan before he took office, and his job performance was basically as expected. Even the Ayatollah Khomeini had an idea what to expect and released the U.S. hostages inauguration day.
I write this article to point out that in the 2012 election the nation is again likely to elect an underqualified candidate without a history of experience in ecological economic affairs of a national and global level, nor of military experience. The next President at best will be another under qualified MBA or governor seeking to promote themselves to the top job—while the nation expects nothing new from their next President except vaguely that he or she would do better in economics. We the people would expect pompous speeches about taxation levels and various kinds of spending, lots of blame and nothing in the way of proven macro-economic competence by the candidate.
It would be a fine thing if several PhDs in economics and ecology with a background as an LT or Captain in the military fought for the nomination every four years. We would like to see candidates run that aren’t simply maximally over-promoted as examples of the American way of perpetual revolution against the citizens that have lived here for a generation or three as if they all were old money and inertially supporters of globalism. Americans expect little and get little from its Presidents. Like the military, a President will perform as they train. If a candidate hasn’t got a real competent plan for reforming and correcting the economy before the campaign, it isn’t likely to be effective if actualized.
As in testing scientific theories, political theories of how to reconstruct or change the economy should be tested substantially before being implemented. That was a major flaw of the Bush II plan to reconstruct Iraq post war for approximately 5 billion dollars. President Obama is confident that his Frankenstinean resuscitation of the Clinton era economy policy with reforms will get the economy going in the right direction under supervision of Clintonista economic advisers, yet some of us believe that a non-sustainable, ad hoc globalist based economic policy is implicitly harmful and likely to crash the economy worse that presently at some point in the future.
Presidents Eisenhower and Reagan were the last two fully qualified nationally integrated Presidents. Each was well known and their political ideas published before taking office. The nation knew what to expect from each individual. In recent years the nation has elected local governors or state politicians promoted too rapidly.
Presidents Obama, Bush, Clinton or Carter hadn't a well-developed public economic and environmental platform in which they worked for several years before running for office. If the public simply elects any modestly articulate candidate able to read a teleprompter, a candidate that has not given serious though to development of actual economic and ecological policy that works for many years—they get an unknown untested President happy just to be President. Such Presidents may not really be up to the task of national leadership.
George H.W. Bush was a phi beta kappa in economics and famous for calling Reaganomics 'voodoo economics'. We find other flaws in President Bush I besides economics, that might have faded in to history without too much problem if not followed up with Clintonomics as the actualizer of 'The New World Order'. The protracted rush to concentrate wealth for global financial elites and to liquidate U.S. nationalism and home owning security led down disastrous courses that have yet to play out.
Richard Nixon was brilliant yet flawed—and could not get elected to the U.S. Senate in California. Though he levered his way onto the Eisenhower administration with that Checker’s speech, he was far less public and known over time before taking office Ronald Regan who as a Democrat supported Eisenhower in the 1952 and 1956 Presidential campaigns.
The nation knew much about Ronald Reagan before he took office, and his job performance was basically as expected. Even the Ayatollah Khomeini had an idea what to expect and released the U.S. hostages inauguration day.
I write this article to point out that in the 2012 election the nation is again likely to elect an underqualified candidate without a history of experience in ecological economic affairs of a national and global level, nor of military experience. The next President at best will be another under qualified MBA or governor seeking to promote themselves to the top job—while the nation expects nothing new from their next President except vaguely that he or she would do better in economics. We the people would expect pompous speeches about taxation levels and various kinds of spending, lots of blame and nothing in the way of proven macro-economic competence by the candidate.
It would be a fine thing if several PhDs in economics and ecology with a background as an LT or Captain in the military fought for the nomination every four years. We would like to see candidates run that aren’t simply maximally over-promoted as examples of the American way of perpetual revolution against the citizens that have lived here for a generation or three as if they all were old money and inertially supporters of globalism. Americans expect little and get little from its Presidents. Like the military, a President will perform as they train. If a candidate hasn’t got a real competent plan for reforming and correcting the economy before the campaign, it isn’t likely to be effective if actualized.
As in testing scientific theories, political theories of how to reconstruct or change the economy should be tested substantially before being implemented. That was a major flaw of the Bush II plan to reconstruct Iraq post war for approximately 5 billion dollars. President Obama is confident that his Frankenstinean resuscitation of the Clinton era economy policy with reforms will get the economy going in the right direction under supervision of Clintonista economic advisers, yet some of us believe that a non-sustainable, ad hoc globalist based economic policy is implicitly harmful and likely to crash the economy worse that presently at some point in the future.
16 August 2010
Defense Secretary Gates Plans His Own Exit Strategy from Pentagon
Defense Sect. Gates said he is leaving January of next year. Respecting his service we are thankful he has decided to leave.
http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Military/2010/0816/Why-would-Defense-Secretary-Robert-Gates-want-to-retire
Often if one announces a plan to leave an employer on a schedule one finds oneself out the door the next day or two. Could this happen to Secretary Gates?
Without 3000 rich people dying each year through terrorism it is hard to say that the perennial occupation of Afghanistan is a necessary policy. If a WTC were being trashed every year then most Americans would support the wastage of a generation of prosperity assuring the rich that the pea under the mattress can be fixed. That might be easier than arresting Osama Bin Ladin and Mullah Omar of course, yet if we leave the area they will probably come out of their caves to gloat and swell thus presenting higher target sillohettes than at present.
Secretary Gates and Chairman of the joint Chiefs Mullins have each made eyes at one another at Senate hearings in support of gaying up the military. We hope that Sect Gates 'coming out' of the Pentagon does not follow a swilling off ending of 'don't ask don't tell' foisting an openly gay policy on the nation as an agent of socialization.
We prefer he take General Petraeus with him. Those of us poor in the civilian sector without jobs do not all desire unelected mouthy generals commenting on political policy for United States military deployments abroad. A good General is one with his mouth shut before the media.
Americans like to have a competent professional military cadre, yet they also want them to support democracy rather than Banana Republic. The 10 years war of Afghanistan is not against the Wehrmacht and Luftwaffe, but against shoeless Taliban getting richer perhaps along with the Muslim OPEC world and contributors while the counter-insurgency guru is limited to strategies that spend money like water.
Ike had a right to comment on war policy and economics--yet he seldom troubled Roosevelt. Patton had a loose tongue, yet he was also a winner rather than a bureaucrat deciding to McClellanize U.S. policy with interminable requests for more and more money and troops. Non-sustainable war economics are as much of an attack on the people of the United States as economic damage caused by the Taliban.
Though the Halliburtons and KBRs got rich during these protracted, incompetently designed neo-war/nation rebuilding efforts it does not follow that it is beneficial to U.S. interests. I do not regard General Petaeus as competent for designing a sustainable political or economic system for Afghanistan. I believe the skill set required is more of an anthropological, sociological, political philosopher, historian range rather than that of military though military competence is also required. The President and Secretaries of State are responsible for the lack of intelligent design in their Afghanistan policy and there is little prospect that competence from the U.S. Government is forthcoming.
We hope the next SecDef has creative thought about containment and de frapping of terrorist assault potential from that region while simultaneously cutting back on the cost of such necessities. Without a far higher ratio of ecologically renewable economic development to war personnel in the U.S .Afghanistan budget there is little reason to expect a sustainable post-American Afghanistan with a benign modern government.
http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Military/2010/0816/Why-would-Defense-Secretary-Robert-Gates-want-to-retire
Often if one announces a plan to leave an employer on a schedule one finds oneself out the door the next day or two. Could this happen to Secretary Gates?
Without 3000 rich people dying each year through terrorism it is hard to say that the perennial occupation of Afghanistan is a necessary policy. If a WTC were being trashed every year then most Americans would support the wastage of a generation of prosperity assuring the rich that the pea under the mattress can be fixed. That might be easier than arresting Osama Bin Ladin and Mullah Omar of course, yet if we leave the area they will probably come out of their caves to gloat and swell thus presenting higher target sillohettes than at present.
Secretary Gates and Chairman of the joint Chiefs Mullins have each made eyes at one another at Senate hearings in support of gaying up the military. We hope that Sect Gates 'coming out' of the Pentagon does not follow a swilling off ending of 'don't ask don't tell' foisting an openly gay policy on the nation as an agent of socialization.
We prefer he take General Petraeus with him. Those of us poor in the civilian sector without jobs do not all desire unelected mouthy generals commenting on political policy for United States military deployments abroad. A good General is one with his mouth shut before the media.
Americans like to have a competent professional military cadre, yet they also want them to support democracy rather than Banana Republic. The 10 years war of Afghanistan is not against the Wehrmacht and Luftwaffe, but against shoeless Taliban getting richer perhaps along with the Muslim OPEC world and contributors while the counter-insurgency guru is limited to strategies that spend money like water.
Ike had a right to comment on war policy and economics--yet he seldom troubled Roosevelt. Patton had a loose tongue, yet he was also a winner rather than a bureaucrat deciding to McClellanize U.S. policy with interminable requests for more and more money and troops. Non-sustainable war economics are as much of an attack on the people of the United States as economic damage caused by the Taliban.
Though the Halliburtons and KBRs got rich during these protracted, incompetently designed neo-war/nation rebuilding efforts it does not follow that it is beneficial to U.S. interests. I do not regard General Petaeus as competent for designing a sustainable political or economic system for Afghanistan. I believe the skill set required is more of an anthropological, sociological, political philosopher, historian range rather than that of military though military competence is also required. The President and Secretaries of State are responsible for the lack of intelligent design in their Afghanistan policy and there is little prospect that competence from the U.S. Government is forthcoming.
We hope the next SecDef has creative thought about containment and de frapping of terrorist assault potential from that region while simultaneously cutting back on the cost of such necessities. Without a far higher ratio of ecologically renewable economic development to war personnel in the U.S .Afghanistan budget there is little reason to expect a sustainable post-American Afghanistan with a benign modern government.
14 August 2010
Uncle Hussein Offers Support for Mosque Near Ground Zero
At the White House at a feast celebrating the end of Ramadan (not the Hotel chain) President B. Hussein Obama declared support for construction of a twelve story mosque near ground zero.
The American author Ambrose Bierce famous for writing science fiction like neo-horror epics in the 19th century was attached to the civil war Union army of the Cumberland who fought confederates in places such as Chicamaugua and Nashville. Bierce commented that Muhmammadans prosyletize with the sword. The muslim mission to New York at the World Trade Center began with the 9-11 plane urban renewal team authorized of Osama Bin Ladin. President Obama speaking at the dinner said that 'this is America'- perhaps meaning stupid, weak and decadent, and that it is religious freedom that is the issue of a mega-mosque planned to go up near ground zero as the next phase of the Muhammadan mission to America.
If Boston were vaporized by a terrorist from New York, wouldn't it be insensitive if ten years later a group wanted to build a religious temple at Harvard Yard to Worship the 1930's Yankees and the Babe? It may be true that the 714 figure was a number never meant to be broken by an honest player, and no one shall again bat .400, yet worshiping the memory of The Babe at a place devastated by terrorists would be unAmerican rather than an expression of religious tolerance not only because Boston does not deserve any image of Ruth within its swamp of globalism.
Actually the issue is not about religious freedom at all. If the Muslims had wanted to build a Mosque somewhere else no one would have cared, its just about the conflict of interest, the gain and follow up to the sword that the 'moderate' muslims are taking advantage of.
Ulysses Grant actually didn't have a middle name, but took the letter S in order to meet some federal requirement for service. The name was changed to Simpson from another invention, and people called him 'Sam'. U.S. Grant recognized the aggression of the confederate armies as a matter of style. Grant never had his head up his ass on Lee's fighting style or those of confederates generally which was to attack. To attack the dar al harb that be us is also the fundamentalist Muslim style though they are not all so skilled as the Wizard of Os improvisationally. President Obama may find it political correct to shoehorn in a twelve story mega-mosque to reward a crack Muslim urban renewal victory, yet many of us find it dopie if not treasonous. Its not about religious freedom--its about war.
Maybe the Democrat party felt safer electing a President named for the Uncle of the False Prophet. Since 9-11 that party has been fundamentally spineless on resisting spending money in Iraq and Afghanistan or for security. If some Texan former spook had planned to Butch up the military and enrich select oil related military industrial complex corporations through clandestine help in crashing 9-11, he couldn't have done more to harm the U.S. economy than the Democrat Party.
It would be a good thing to elect a President who does not celebrate the Ramadan every year in the White House. Its disorienting to have a guy who grew up down in Indonesia telling New Yorkers and the nation to f themselvesso they can bow five times a day to Saudi Arabia and the real oily world trade center. .
The American author Ambrose Bierce famous for writing science fiction like neo-horror epics in the 19th century was attached to the civil war Union army of the Cumberland who fought confederates in places such as Chicamaugua and Nashville. Bierce commented that Muhmammadans prosyletize with the sword. The muslim mission to New York at the World Trade Center began with the 9-11 plane urban renewal team authorized of Osama Bin Ladin. President Obama speaking at the dinner said that 'this is America'- perhaps meaning stupid, weak and decadent, and that it is religious freedom that is the issue of a mega-mosque planned to go up near ground zero as the next phase of the Muhammadan mission to America.
If Boston were vaporized by a terrorist from New York, wouldn't it be insensitive if ten years later a group wanted to build a religious temple at Harvard Yard to Worship the 1930's Yankees and the Babe? It may be true that the 714 figure was a number never meant to be broken by an honest player, and no one shall again bat .400, yet worshiping the memory of The Babe at a place devastated by terrorists would be unAmerican rather than an expression of religious tolerance not only because Boston does not deserve any image of Ruth within its swamp of globalism.
Actually the issue is not about religious freedom at all. If the Muslims had wanted to build a Mosque somewhere else no one would have cared, its just about the conflict of interest, the gain and follow up to the sword that the 'moderate' muslims are taking advantage of.
Ulysses Grant actually didn't have a middle name, but took the letter S in order to meet some federal requirement for service. The name was changed to Simpson from another invention, and people called him 'Sam'. U.S. Grant recognized the aggression of the confederate armies as a matter of style. Grant never had his head up his ass on Lee's fighting style or those of confederates generally which was to attack. To attack the dar al harb that be us is also the fundamentalist Muslim style though they are not all so skilled as the Wizard of Os improvisationally. President Obama may find it political correct to shoehorn in a twelve story mega-mosque to reward a crack Muslim urban renewal victory, yet many of us find it dopie if not treasonous. Its not about religious freedom--its about war.
Maybe the Democrat party felt safer electing a President named for the Uncle of the False Prophet. Since 9-11 that party has been fundamentally spineless on resisting spending money in Iraq and Afghanistan or for security. If some Texan former spook had planned to Butch up the military and enrich select oil related military industrial complex corporations through clandestine help in crashing 9-11, he couldn't have done more to harm the U.S. economy than the Democrat Party.
It would be a good thing to elect a President who does not celebrate the Ramadan every year in the White House. Its disorienting to have a guy who grew up down in Indonesia telling New Yorkers and the nation to f themselvesso they can bow five times a day to Saudi Arabia and the real oily world trade center. .
13 August 2010
Federal Judge Vaughn R. Walker Is Just Bent On Veto-ing Calif. Prop 8
Chief U.S. District Judge Vaughn R. Walker in his attack on Proposition 8 offers reasoning that the people of California who passed the measure to change the definition of marriage from heterosexual have no standing to appeal his veto to the 9th circuit court since they aren't homos affected by his ruling.
The Judge seems to believe that the citizens of a state have no interest implicitly in how their social institutions exist or what they are, and that a Judge can expropriate their fundamental rights and design society, language and truth in accord with their personal will, whims, Lewis Carrolian fantasies of reality and what is good for the gays of San Francisco.
http://ap.juneauempire.com/pstories/20100813/694425170.shtml
Judge Walker is becoming something of a legendary farce for judicial activism in the U.S.A.
The entire human social history of heterosexual marriage joining families together with new births, of exchanging family members of blood to tie together royal dynasties, the value of marriage as a way of tracing bloodlines and ancestry is all at stake as the judge seeks to change the core meaning of marriage to cohabitation with non-reproductive sex of any sorts of beings in whatever numbers. Judge Walker is simply bent and should not try to substitute for social will and legislative action with judicial corruption of law and language. He is perhaps a deep-water Bush-Bohemian Grove Gay putcher himself who does substantial harm to the integrity of the United States.
There are innumerable legal remedies for the things homosexuals desire in seeking a cargo cultists approach to being like heterosexuals. If they want health care benefits or special tax breaks available to heterosexual couples that are married, or inheritance rights there are other means to make such things available for those not heterosexual and married. If is an unfortunate fact that homosexuals seem to wish to attack and destroy heterosexual social norms and institutions because they dissent with heterosexuality. It is a sad fact that Judge Walker as a homosexual advocate in California makes a globalist, corporatist, atheistic perverted putsch to annihilate human decency at its most cherished core values such as the social institution of marriage and a joke of the prose-poem Footprints simultaneously. The corrupting power of the U.S. Judiciary and the California Federal Judiciary in particular is threatening to the security of the United States at times, and definitely not a friend of democracy on this occasion.
There is no need for homosexuals to directly attack and annihilate the heterosexual historical institution of marriage of society in order to secure whatever interests they seek socially as equal citizens. Forcing through Judicial activism the end of marriage as a heterosexual institution upon society would traditionally open the door to destabilizing social remedies through other means than government, when government is corrupted. That has happened more than once in history, and in this challenging era the need for society to defend itself from an attack from within by foreign and domestic homosexual activists is distracting.
The Judge seems to believe that the citizens of a state have no interest implicitly in how their social institutions exist or what they are, and that a Judge can expropriate their fundamental rights and design society, language and truth in accord with their personal will, whims, Lewis Carrolian fantasies of reality and what is good for the gays of San Francisco.
http://ap.juneauempire.com/pstories/20100813/694425170.shtml
Judge Walker is becoming something of a legendary farce for judicial activism in the U.S.A.
The entire human social history of heterosexual marriage joining families together with new births, of exchanging family members of blood to tie together royal dynasties, the value of marriage as a way of tracing bloodlines and ancestry is all at stake as the judge seeks to change the core meaning of marriage to cohabitation with non-reproductive sex of any sorts of beings in whatever numbers. Judge Walker is simply bent and should not try to substitute for social will and legislative action with judicial corruption of law and language. He is perhaps a deep-water Bush-Bohemian Grove Gay putcher himself who does substantial harm to the integrity of the United States.
There are innumerable legal remedies for the things homosexuals desire in seeking a cargo cultists approach to being like heterosexuals. If they want health care benefits or special tax breaks available to heterosexual couples that are married, or inheritance rights there are other means to make such things available for those not heterosexual and married. If is an unfortunate fact that homosexuals seem to wish to attack and destroy heterosexual social norms and institutions because they dissent with heterosexuality. It is a sad fact that Judge Walker as a homosexual advocate in California makes a globalist, corporatist, atheistic perverted putsch to annihilate human decency at its most cherished core values such as the social institution of marriage and a joke of the prose-poem Footprints simultaneously. The corrupting power of the U.S. Judiciary and the California Federal Judiciary in particular is threatening to the security of the United States at times, and definitely not a friend of democracy on this occasion.
There is no need for homosexuals to directly attack and annihilate the heterosexual historical institution of marriage of society in order to secure whatever interests they seek socially as equal citizens. Forcing through Judicial activism the end of marriage as a heterosexual institution upon society would traditionally open the door to destabilizing social remedies through other means than government, when government is corrupted. That has happened more than once in history, and in this challenging era the need for society to defend itself from an attack from within by foreign and domestic homosexual activists is distracting.
Early Universe, Consciousness, Phase Transitions and Hot Tub Heart Attacks
Reading 'The Cosmic Jackpot’ the idea of variable constants in the low temperature range of physics amidst different pocket universes of an eternal inflaton seems a reasonable enough idea. At the trillion trillion degrees range near the very start of time before a Higgs field extended much with inflation there would be no proximal profusion of fundamental force pluralism. Such a regime would be inhospitable to the being of consciousness of a physically supported sort.
Davies seems to suggest that at lower temperature range more 'fancy' aggregation of matter can form, such as life and consciousness. Complexity in matter forms toward low temperature rather than high. Initial values of ratios such as protons to neutrons were formed early in the high temperature era, there is much fine-tuning of constants.
One of the most interesting is dark energy--if it were slightly more matter would be blown apart by a seeming anti-gravity, and slightly less would create a powerful collapsing force such as ultra-gravity. No one knows what dark energy is or if it exists as a particle of some sort getting power from a Higgs or anti-Higgs field in some way. Interesting stuff to think about--including phase transition of water into an ordered crystal lattice at 0 degrees centigrade. Phase transitions of matter may be somewhat like that of consciousness emerging from matter. At some point through the construction of complexity mass is able to transition into consciousness thank God.
Davies mentioned the very low temperature range at which D.N.A. dissociates. It breaks down entirely at 200 some degrees C and is harmed substantially before that. Obviously I regarded hot tub heart attacks and other problems affected by temperature increase--perhaps global warming will affect consciousness too making some fail to support a substantial extra-terrestrial moon base project or California proposition 8-2010.
Davies seems to suggest that at lower temperature range more 'fancy' aggregation of matter can form, such as life and consciousness. Complexity in matter forms toward low temperature rather than high. Initial values of ratios such as protons to neutrons were formed early in the high temperature era, there is much fine-tuning of constants.
One of the most interesting is dark energy--if it were slightly more matter would be blown apart by a seeming anti-gravity, and slightly less would create a powerful collapsing force such as ultra-gravity. No one knows what dark energy is or if it exists as a particle of some sort getting power from a Higgs or anti-Higgs field in some way. Interesting stuff to think about--including phase transition of water into an ordered crystal lattice at 0 degrees centigrade. Phase transitions of matter may be somewhat like that of consciousness emerging from matter. At some point through the construction of complexity mass is able to transition into consciousness thank God.
Davies mentioned the very low temperature range at which D.N.A. dissociates. It breaks down entirely at 200 some degrees C and is harmed substantially before that. Obviously I regarded hot tub heart attacks and other problems affected by temperature increase--perhaps global warming will affect consciousness too making some fail to support a substantial extra-terrestrial moon base project or California proposition 8-2010.
More Reasons Why Art Is Useful and Important
Computer art is useful and sometimes important for education as well an entertainment .From sketches of synthetic extra-terrestrial planets to some really excellent civil war drawings of Lee's army of Virginia crossing the Potomac on their way to forage for food and war in Pennsylvania in which Taoist water, wood and mist settings with a few fuzzy logic soldiers leaning on muskets as if they were staffs for a long journey while they waited on a small boat amidst the reeds along the shore, art may inform us of history and brief us on philosophical or scientific concepts. Symbolism in art works may be very fine today including presentation of imaginary portrayals of the big bang and inflation.
Such cosmological art would have been exploited by the pre-Socratic philosophers if they had time away from interminable war with the Persians, Spartans or whomever was taxing their time. Word art in writing is also helpful for illustrating points. The art of logic and the art of chess are skills, yet they are also developed with singular styles as one's ability allows. 'The Portrait of The Artist as A Young Man' by Joyce leads us toward 'Finnegan's Wake' and a wealth of comparative linguistic and historical ideas regarding the potential for word construction and meaning.
Wittgenstein, Sartre and Quine were all probably aware of Joyce, Lewis Carrol was a linguist and something of a logician who invented his own language as well as an alternate fiction reality. The creative mind of the artist may even find its way like three quarks for muster mork into naming the constituent units from the Higgs field at the smallest level providing the strong force to hold things together so far as we know or guess.
Some of the good artists educate as well entertain. The use of symbols to convey meaning has few arbitrary limits.
Such cosmological art would have been exploited by the pre-Socratic philosophers if they had time away from interminable war with the Persians, Spartans or whomever was taxing their time. Word art in writing is also helpful for illustrating points. The art of logic and the art of chess are skills, yet they are also developed with singular styles as one's ability allows. 'The Portrait of The Artist as A Young Man' by Joyce leads us toward 'Finnegan's Wake' and a wealth of comparative linguistic and historical ideas regarding the potential for word construction and meaning.
Wittgenstein, Sartre and Quine were all probably aware of Joyce, Lewis Carrol was a linguist and something of a logician who invented his own language as well as an alternate fiction reality. The creative mind of the artist may even find its way like three quarks for muster mork into naming the constituent units from the Higgs field at the smallest level providing the strong force to hold things together so far as we know or guess.
Some of the good artists educate as well entertain. The use of symbols to convey meaning has few arbitrary limits.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
-
It is a rather amusing fact that some political elites didn't get the candidate they wanted this year. Ordinary Americans have experie...
-
Upgrading standard hard-plastic Halloween masks with eye covering and nose and mouth filters probably would substantially reduce the odds of...
