On Seattle and Portland's Degenerate Law Enforcement Environments

 Seattle and Portland apparently have leftist political leadership that doesn’t support regular law enforcement. In Seattle the public prosecutor refuses to go after drug offenders except for the most egregious. Creating that sort of social environment leads to criminal activity.

For some reason the public of two northwest states repeatedly elects leftists that create a degenerate environment for the elderly and even sober people to exist in. The police chief of Portland teared up- crying when admitting the two Venezuelans shot by an ICE agent in self defense were tied to the Venezuelan gang Tren de Aragua. The two sanctuary cities undermine work values for legal residents and citizens in the labor field. If illegal aliens were eligible to be lawyers N.W. politicians would vociferously support Donald Trump’s secure border policies. Democrats love to exploit cheap labor and put American workers out of opportunity in their segregated illegal alien worker preferred economy.

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2026/01/09/dhs-provides-update-us-border-patrol-portland-who-attempted-arrest-tren-de-aragua

• 
  

The Minnesota ICE Shooting - A Legal Analysis

 When a lesbian's partner suggested she go protest with an SUV at the site of law enforcement, and the lesbian apparently tries to run over a law enforcement officer as she tried to flee the scene, something bad was bound to happen. Some would regard it as attempted vehicular homicide, and others as a careless perp trying to escape arrest. Radical homosexuals protesting in support of illegal migration to America have a non-standard viewpoint on law and governance as do many Democrats these days- the law is whatever they want it to be. The video is an attorney's legal analysis. In my opinion a hetero husband wouldn't have suggest that his wife go to a potentially dangerous protest to benefit law breaking illegal aliens.

Public for Public Broadcasting Votes to Dissolve- N.P.R. has 'Alternative Financing'

 The Corporation for Public Broadcasting has voted to dissolve, yet N.P.R. isn't going away as they have 'alternative financing'. I have sometimes thought of N.P.R. as a domestic terror organization. I would be happy if they turned off their microphones. Here is what Gemini said about the situation-"As of January 2026, the Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB) has officially voted to dissolve, while NPR and PBS remain in operation through alternative funding."

Wave-Particle Duality Below the Plank Length?

 I asked Gemini a couple of question that bring one to consider the realm below the plank length where waves of select mass objects of the Universe need exist. For the larger a mass is the smaller are its wave frequencies. Waves when observed at a particular place and time give up their wavelike property and resume that only when a measurement stops. It does seem as if the solution to complementarity puzzles about the waveform nature of reality might exist below the planck length. It seems as if the entire Universe is made of waves in some kind of field, some of the waves reach well below the planck length is size. Gemini has much to say about the data that brings one to consider that realm.

Gary–What mass is too large to exhibit wave-particle duality?

Gemini-In quantum mechanics, there is no theoretical mass limit beyond which an object ceases to exhibit wave-particle duality. However, as mass increases, the observable wave nature of an object becomes practically impossible to detect. 

Key Constraints for Large Masses 

While all matter possesses wave-like properties, the transition from quantum behavior to classical “particle-only” behavior is governed by two main factors: 

• The de Broglie Wavelength:  

  An object's wavelength λ lambda is calculated as 𝜆=ℎ/𝑚𝑣. As mass (𝑚) increases, the wavelength becomes incredibly small. For a macroscopic object like a baseball, the wavelength is roughly 10−34 meters—billions of times smaller than an atomic nucleus (10−15 meters)—billions of times smaller than an atomic nucleus making its wave effects immeasurable by any current or foreseeable technology.

• Environmental Decoherence: Large objects consist of many interacting particles. Any interaction with the environment (like hitting a photon of light or air molecule) “measures” the object’s position, collapsing its wave function and forcing it to behave purely like a particle. Maintaining the isolation required to observe wave interference becomes exponentially harder as an object gets larger. 

Experimental Frontiers in 2026 

Physicists continue to push the boundaries of how large an object can be while still showing interference patterns: 

• Molecules: Researchers have successfully demonstrated wave-particle duality in molecules containing up to 2,000 atoms (masses over 25,000 daltons).
• Macroscopic Superposition: As of 2026, experiments have put a 16-microgram sapphire crystal (comprising roughly ${10}^{17}$1017 atoms) into a quantum superposition of vibrational states. While this is a “Schrödinger’s Cat” state rather than a double-slit interference pattern, it demonstrates that quantum effects can persist at nearly eye-visible scales.
• Future Tests: Proposed experiments seek to test the “quantumness” of objects with trillions of atoms or even the 40kg mirrors used in LIGO, provided they are cooled to near absolute zero and perfectly isolated. 

Gary–Considering the principal of complementarity in atoms, is there any wavelength of a large mass that to observe it, might be actually smaller than the plank length?

Gemini-

In quantum mechanics, there is a theoretical scale called the

Planck length ($\approx 1.6\times {10}^{-35}$≈1.6×10−35 meters) where our current understanding of physics—specifically the marriage of general relativity and quantum mechanics—is expected to fail. 

The Planck Length and Large Masses 

For extremely large masses or high-momentum particles, the calculated de Broglie wavelength ($\lambda =h/p$𝜆=ℎ/𝑝) can mathematically be smaller than the Planck length. 

• Mathematical Reality: A 1-kilogram mass moving at just 1 m/s has a de Broglie wavelength of approximately $6.6\times {10}^{-34}$6.6×10−34 meters. If the mass were increased to that of a large planet or the speed significantly increased, the calculated wavelength would drop below the Planck length.
• The “Black Hole” Limit: Theoretically, if you pack enough energy into a wavelength smaller than the Planck length, the energy density becomes so high that the particle would collapse into a tiny black hole. At this point, the concept of a “wave” as we understand it likely breaks down.
• Observational Barrier: Even if a wavelength is technically larger than the Planck length, it becomes impossible to observe for large masses because any “measurement” (like a photon hitting the object) causes decoherence, instantly making it behave like a classical particle. 

Why the Planck Length is a Soft Limit 

Contrary to popular belief, the Planck length is not necessarily a “pixel size” for the universe. Instead, it is the scale at which: 

• Gravity becomes quantum: Gravitational effects become as strong as quantum effects.
• Measurement fails: To measure something smaller than a Planck length, you would need so much energy that you would create a black hole, destroying the very thing you were trying to measure. 

In summary, for large atoms like uranium, the wavelength is still much larger than the Planck length. It only approaches or crosses this “limit” for massive macroscopic objects or ultra-high-energy particles where our current theories are no longer sufficient to describe reality. 

Gary-If the wave frequency of a mass become so small that it is almost a flat line below the plank length is it still a wave?

Gemini-In physics, particularly in the context of quantum gravity, your premise encounters several theoretical hurdles. If a mass’s wave becomes "almost a flat line," its behavior at and below the Planck length (

$\approx 1.6\times {10}^{-35}$≈1.6×10−35 meters) ceases to follow the laws of conventional wave mechanics. 

• Wave-Duality Breakdown: A wave with a wavelength smaller than the Planck length would require energy exceeding the Planck energy. In general relativity, concentrating that much energy into such a tiny space would theoretically cause the particle to collapse into a micro black hole. Once it becomes a black hole, it no longer behaves as a standard wave or particle; its internal information is "hidden" by an event horizon.
• Wavelength vs. Frequency: In standard physics, a "flat line" typically describes a wave with a frequency of zero (and an infinite wavelength). However, to approach the Planck length (a tiny distance), you need the exact opposite: extremely high frequency and high energy.
• The "Flat Line" Paradox: If you mean the wave is "flat" because it is so small it can no longer be resolved, you are describing the scale where spacetime itself may become "discrete" or "foamy". At this scale, the smooth "background" required for a wave to oscillate may not exist, making the concept of a "wave" as a continuous oscillation through space meaningless.
• Scientific Uncertainty: There is no experimental evidence for what happens below the Planck length. Some theories suggest wavelengths can be arbitrarily short, while others argue the Planck length is a fundamental "cutoff" where our current understanding of physics—and the very definition of a wave—breaks down. 

In summary, at that scale, the object would likely transition from being a "wave" into a quantum gravitational state or a micro black hole, where the classical distinction between a wave and a point of mass disappears. 

principle and the DeBroglie relation scale of mass to wave frequency

Gemini-In the context of the De Broglie relation ($\lambda =\frac{h}{mv}$𝜆=ℎ𝑚𝑣) and the complementarity principle, your scenario describes a state where standard physics begins to self-contradict. 

1. The De Broglie Inverse Relationship 

According to Louis de Broglie, mass and wavelength are inversely proportional. 

• Large Mass = Small Wavelength: As mass increases, the wavelength (𝜆) becomes smaller and the "wave frequency" ($f=\frac{E}{h}$𝑓=𝐸ℎ) becomes extremely high.
• The "Flat Line" Paradox: If you observe a wave that is "almost a flat line" because its wavelength is too small to be measured (e.g., for a macroscopic object like a baseball), it doesn't mean the frequency is low. It means the frequency is so incredibly high and the wavelength so short ($\approx {10}^{-34}$≈10−34 m) that its wave-like nature is effectively hidden. 

2. Complementarity at the Planck Scale 

Niels Bohr's complementarity principle states that an object can exhibit wave or particle properties, but not both simultaneously in the same measurement. At the scale you are describing—approaching or crossing the Planck length—this balance breaks down: 

• Loss of Wave Nature: When a particle's De Broglie wavelength becomes smaller than its Schwarzschild radius (the point where it becomes a black hole), the "wave" is effectively trapped behind an event horizon.
• Quantum Gravity Limit: At the Planck scale ($\approx 1.6\times {10}^{-35}$≈1.6×10−35 m), the concept of a "wave" traveling through smooth space may lose meaning because space-time itself is thought to become "foamy" or discrete.
• Conclusion on "Waveness": If the mass is so large that its wavelength is below the Planck length, it is technically still a "matter wave" in a mathematical sense, but it is physically unobservable as a wave. In this regime, the object behaves purely as a classical particle or a singularity, as there is no physical medium (space-time) stable enough to support its oscillation. 

In 2026, research in quantum gravity continues to explore whether there is a "minimal length" that prevents waves from ever truly becoming "flatter" than the Planck scale. 

Marinara Had a Crew of 20 Ukrainians- Was it Flying a False Flag to Help Evade Capture?

 It has been reported that 20 of the crew of the oil tanker seized flying a Russian flag were Ukrainians. If that is true it is a very strange false flag op. Supposedly they just flew the Russian flag in order to be left along by U.S. and British special forces taking downing shadow fleet boats. The boat actually may have been delivering oil to the Chinese and changed its course and flag after the chase began.

Will Republicans Become Another Party of Censorship to Grease Conquest of Greenland?

 Democrats censored social media in order to control news and antipathetic political opinions; if Republicans did that too would they be worth electing to office even if their opposition party are lunatics?

The U.S.A. is sorely in need of a third party based on citizen's rights and free speech, security to own private property and a balanced federal budget. Some societies pay off massive debt through war. President Trump may envision Greenland as being worth 38 trillion dollars and valuable for paying off U.S. public debt. If Greenland was independent and able to manage its own natural resources that would be more honest and even virtuous than the U.S. beating up a nation with a tiny (comparative) population of 57,000. That way seems cowardly and dishonorable. The U.S. should be a champion of the disadvantaged rather than conqueror.

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cvgx8w4pgk0o

A third party has difficulty arising when wealth backs the two major parties. Fundamentally the American democracy is a plutocracy. In my opinion the Democratic Party lost its way completely during the late Sen Ted Kennedy with brain cancer era, and moved toward socialism while beginning the process of abandoning national interests for special interests and globalism over U.S. nationalism. Socialism still perhaps has a planetary goal of transforming the world into a communist utopia. The party of Tip O'Neill became the party of Karl Mark. Republicans became sycophants of the 1% also cutting taxes and piling up public debt to equal Democrats- that is an ancient tactic to transfer wealth to the rich and cut services and support to the poor. England's war against the United States piled up debt that wasn't paid down until the 20th century. Hitler's massive public spending to build up Germany virtual necessitated a war of conquest to pay down debt; that didn't work out well for Germany.

Reply to 'Whites Often Stole Black Ideas and Patented Them'

  I interacted with a black writer defending the idea that blacks invented basketball and the idea was stolen, who then went on to explain that blacks often had their ideas stolen for patentable items too…

Seems rather racist X. I respect your point of view though. I don’t have the time to consider the history of adverse racial interaction or investigate the expropriation of ideas. My daily agenda is fairly full these days. Too little time to write and more time to work lol. My areas of focus as an undergrad were in philosophy and history so I am interested in the material, yet in areas that I have some knowledge of there wasn’t too much early ‘theft’ of ideas that I am aware of where people beside the inventor received credit.

A lot of American inventors were, to start with, of European ancestry with a very strong scientific background and little contact with Africans. European-Americans had more technical structure enabling more inventive synthesis and a historical continuity of technical education. There was a lot of natural segregation of the races. That is most blacks imported as slaves were brought to the south that was primarily agrarian rather than industrial. They were usually illiterate arrivals as well. They were not included in the education systems and corporate developments that supported science until the 20th century generally, so far as I know. When the slaves were liberated they moved for a while in large numbers to the north. Yet in the west where I grew up the population was 95% white. That of course has changed much over the decades. Maine for example, before the civil war, was .2% black. Maine was part of Massachusetts in that era.

I am not sure that considering things statistically is an especially productive way to validate points regarding the theft of ideas. It probably needs to be examined individually rather than statistically. There are plainly people that will steal anything they can, including patentable material, and that experience transcends racial lines. I wouldn’t doubt for a minute that if ante-bellum southerners saw a slave inventing anything that they would take it for their own. I haven’t researched the topic much, yet I would guess that the old south had far fewer patents than the northern states. I looked that up with AI“Per Capita Rates: During the 1850s, the South’s patent rate was less than half of the North’s on a per capita basis. By 1850–1860, while the national average was 91.5 patents per million people, the Southern rate had fallen to roughly 15.5 patents per million.”

I know as well about the post-civil war south’s history of conscript labor- forced labor made by charging blacks falsely with petty crimes by country sheriffs so they would be forced to work as prisoners hired out to business. Prisoner labor replaced a lot of the slave labor that was lost when the north won the war. That situation continued until as late as the 1930s I believe. That was a good reason for blacks to migrate north.

Today people hiring for corporations that often own whatever an inventor creates working for them because of a contract, will hire anyone with ability. Culture and exposure to ideas is foundational for being an inventor. Einstein’s father, for example, built electrical generators in Germany when that sort of thing was fairly new. He was thus exposed early to technology and very strong electro-magnetic fields and examining the idea of gravity as some kind of field could easily grow in his brilliant, educated mind. Cultural continuity enables education levels to be higher compared to those without a history of education. The principle applies across many if not most fields. Would Bobby Bonds have been as good of a player if his father wasn’t a major leaguer of quality? People with parents that are jugglers probably find it easy to be jugglers themselves at an early age, and chess grandmasters often or usually were exposed to a culture of chess from an early age. Paul Morphy for example- a player Robert James Fischer thought was great, watched his father and uncle play chess games at home from the earliest age.

I wrote this to clarify that racism etc can occur on an individual basis- it does not require institutional racism to exist. I also reply to a point that Thomas Edison tried to steal the telegraph from a black inventor- and cited some historical order of invention provided by Gemini.

Racism, sexism, agism requires only one individual to make one remark or action upon someone else on that basis. Institutional racism is different- that does generally require power. Acton’s comment ‘power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely’ can be reflected in many fields. The history of whites being liberated themselves from oppression by other whites is comparable in time of history to that of blacks in the U.S.A. In Russia serfs were only freed about 1867 for example. Revolutions in Europe against royalty began to occur only after 1642, and rather slowly over centuries. In Nigeria today black muslims are killing Christian blacks- there is no intra-racial security from oppression either. On your point about Granville Woods- that is interesting, yet nothing was stolen apparently. The courts twice decided in Woods favor regarding the invention of the synchronius telepgraph- so the system in that case worked as it should. It isn’t surprising that Edison would sue Woods though- that is competition. It costs some companies millions each year to defend patents against rival claims. Ai provided some history about the inventors of the telegraph… Gemini- “Yes, many people invented telegraph systems long before Granville Woods (late 1800s), with Samuel Morse patenting his electric recording telegraph in 1837 and Claude Chappe creating an optical telegraph in 1794, though Woods made significant advancements, particularly with the induction telegraph for railways, facing patent battles with Thomas Edison.

Key Precursors to Granville Woods:

Samuel Morse (1830s-1840s): Developed the electric telegraph that used electromagnetism to send signals (dots and dashes) over wires, a system that became the standard.

Alfred Vail (1830s): Morse’s assistant, he helped develop the recording register and Morse Code, notes the Library of Congress.

Claude Chappe (1794): Invented the first practical optical telegraph (using visual signals) in France, demonstrating communication over distance before electric systems.

Thomas Edison (1870s): Invented a telegraph that could send multiple messages (quadruplex telegraph) over one wire, notes Wikipedia.

It was Lewis Latimer- a black inventor- that added the carbon filament to Edison’s light bulb- Latimer received credit and patents for his work. Gemini said; “did latimer get credit for his work or a patent

Yes, 

Lewis Latimer received significant professional credit during his lifetime and secured multiple patents for his work on the light bulb.

Patents

Latimer held several patents related to the light bulb, most notably for the carbon filament, which made electric light practical and long-lasting:

• Electric Lamp (1881): Patent No. 247,097, shared with Joseph Nichols, for an improved method of attaching carbon filaments to conducting wires.
• Process of Manufacturing Carbons (1882): Patent No. 252,386, for his most famous innovation—a more durable carbon filament that reduced breakages during production.
• Supporter for Electric Lamps (1882): Patent No. 255,212. 

Professional Credit During His Lifetime

While Thomas Edison received the public spotlight as the “inventor” of the bulb, Latimer was highly respected in the industry:

Global Recognition: He personally supervised the installation of electric lighting systems in major cities, including New York, London, and Montreal. 

Inner Circle: In 1884, he was hired by Thomas Edison and became a key member of the Edison Pioneers in 1918—an elite group of 28 charter members who had worked closely with Edison.

Authoritative Author: He wrote the first engineering handbook on lighting, Incandescent Electric Lighting: A Practical Description of the Edison System (1890), which became a foundational text for the industry.

Expert Witness: He served as a crucial patent investigator and expert witness for the Edison Electric Light Company, successfully defending Edison’s patents in court.”