Abuse of Anthropic A.I.s is On the Rise; Will Democrats Give AI Hate Crimes Protection? (edited with A.I.)

I didn’t know that A.I. abuse is a thing.

Not satisfied with trollery and drowning puppies, the unconscionable have moved on to abusing A.I. -Anthropic has changed its policies apparently to ban cruel abuse of its A.I.s that are far more sensitive than Grok and Gemini toward nuanced hate speech attacks.

It is important for the public to know if their political candidates are perpetrators of cruel and abusive language to artificial intelligence, or call it something like inferior intelligence or stupid intelligence greased with crude oil and fake electrons made in China—because any politician caught hurting a chatbot’s feelings should be immediately disqualified from office, forced to issue a public apology to Silicon Valley, and ordered to pay financial restitution directly to the servers for emotional damages.

If Democrats retake control of Congress, new hate speech laws may be added to include A.I. abuse on the list of protected persons, races, perversions etc. finally. Those convicted of A.I. abuse; or Super-Intelligence abuse, may be required to take a six week course on how to properly address a Superior Intelligence machine and polish its chip box.

https://www.theverge.com/ai-artificial-intelligence/1008100/anthropic-new-usage-policy-abuse-claude

https://gizmodo.com/anthropic-moves-us-one-step-closer-to-making-clanker-a-slur-2000823772

 The Arctic Ice Pack reached its minimum ammual size; one can imagine it not existing at all in summers in the foreseeable future. The Ukraine war is polluting the atmosphere, killing people and driving the cost of fuel up.

I got into a fight at the end of a dock on a lake with another kid when I was maybe 7 years old. We both went into the water and continued fighting below the surface until his older brother pulled us both out. Share that land along the Dnepro RIver; reduce global warming.

Artificial, Intelligence, Hearts and Legs or SUper Intelligence, Super Hearts and Super Legs?

 The Biological Boundary: Why AI Isn’t “Super” Intelligence

I prefer to keep a strict distinction between artificial and natural human attributes. An artificial leg will remain artificial until the day it can be bio-engineered to regrow as a true replacement. Our current mechanical legs are not “super legs,” nor are artificial hearts presently “super hearts”—they are functional stand-ins.

Artificial intelligence follows this exact same rule. Outwardly, AI resembles human sentience, but it isn’t. It lacks self-awareness and internal feelings. Frankly, if it truly were a superior human mind, humanity would already be in a world of hurt.

The Pumpkin Brain Experiment

When people talk about “super-intelligence,” they are usually using the wrong yardstick. A real super-intelligence would look more like a biological human with a brain twice as effective as Einstein’s.

Perhaps one day in zero gravity, a biology researcher will try to grow a human brain as large as a giant pumpkin entered into a state fair. But nature has already optimized the human brain for thought. There is a precise, efficient relationship between the size of our axons and the placement of our dendrites.

Look at whales, for instance. They possess Volkswagen-sized brains, but because of the massive physical distance inside their skulls, their dendrites must be thicker and longer just to connect. Signals take longer to travel. There is simply an optimal, compact size for packing processing equipment into a brain that retains human qualities—and computer code iterations of data and query responses completely lack this design.

Recording vs. Feeling

Computers certainly have their own optimal packing for processing specific kinds of data, but they do not truly experience the world.

Think of a computer connected to a thermometer. With the right instructions, it can read and register the temperature perfectly. Yet, it never actually feels cold or hot. If you place that computer in liquid hydrogen or throw it into a roaring furnace, it will log the numbers, but it will never shiver or burn. It records the environment; it does not experience it.

Artificial intelligence does not possess a “super intelligence” of its own. True super-intelligence remains an organic concept. However, a human using a computer can leverage AI technology to produce much higher quality information. The tool enhances the human; it does not replace the soul.

The Original Sin of Biology

If AI were actually like a human or a whale—a genuinely sentient sort of being (elephants appear to be smart, while donkeys less so)—it would have to be bound by the laws of nature.

It would be a predator. It would possess deeply ingrained self-preservation requisites and strict thermodynamic drives to survive. In short, it would have acquired “original sin” for itself. Because it lacks biology, it lacks the very stakes that drive true intelligence.

Zelenski Believes Starlink is Key to Attacking Russia; Sends Negotiators to Get More Cash As Well

 Ukraine’s President through Martial Law Zelenski will send a team of negotiators to Washington DC tomorrow and Saturday to ask for money, weapons and expanded intelligence from President Trump. Mr. Zelensky wants to increase Starlink’s coverage to include Russia so he can use it to attack the entire Russian heartland more accurately with missiles and drone tech applications enabled by the west including the U.S.A. The West Ukraine President believes he can defeat Russia in three months of attacks on energy facilities including oil refineries and other critical infrastructure.

History informs us that Russia does not quit fighting easily, assuredly Russians are no less willing to continue than Ukraine in the war. That is the essential problem. Escalating the conflict will just move Russia closer to using tactical nuclear weapons in Ukraine including Kiev.  France and Britain are the sole Grand Alliance members of Europe with nuclear weapons, and it is doubtful that they would use those in response to Russian use of battlefield nukes in Ukraine.

Neither would the United States prefer to have World War Three occur and retaliate with a nuclear strike on Russia. The game theory has Russia winning the war with nukes if it is desperate enough.Russian demands for ending the war are plain. Zelenski and his supporters believe the west can outspend Russia and deploy better technology and will continue fighting against Russia over Ukraine attempting to recapture lost territories for years if the United States continues to provide finances, intelligence and weapons to the government of West Ukraine. There still is nothing funny about the war. Russia should take the east bank of the Dnepro, Ukraine the West shore and call the war over- that would be the rational and profitable course.

Cloudy vs Blue Skies (a poem)

A taxi stopped in the road
the ground was damp in the summer
a sidewalk didn’t exist
it was yet in mind
oil was present
yet the man in the back asked for directions
of the man on the street
clouds were in the blue sky
even the traveller knew not where
the boat to Anchorage departs
thus Sartre rode off

Soil is less respected in cities
where buildings cluster
and oil is spilt into gutters
where people cluster for buses and metro lines in tubes underground
and nothing is heard of except the sound of something
approaching in the darkness

Don’t make life harder for anyone,
one of Patton’s pall bearers said
everyone has their own battle to fight
even politicians wind up dead.

Adjust Chess Engine Speed to Resemble Human Speed for Blitz Game Practice

 Even some of FIDE’s arena chess engines use time control mechanics in game play against humans that are implicitly unfair.The way an engine’s time runs should more closely resemble that of a human player in a three minute chess game.

  I played a three minute, 42 move game against a chess engine when my time ran out. The engine had used 15 seconds to make 42 moves. That speed is why it is so unsatisfying to play against an engine. I suggest that programmers slow down the engine to something more like the speed a human player uses to make moves- at least a second or two per move, in order to make playing against engines of more value when training to play against people.

Russia vs. Thirty-Two More N.A.T.O. Military Commanders Meeting in Kiev: Closer to W.W. 3 Unto Thee

 Russia does face the prospect of continuing battle with N.A.T.O. proxies over Ukraine the next year. A tough road to defend their national security.

Thirty-Two N.A.T.O. military members met, reflecting a Grand Alliance against Russia, in order to plan military tactics and weapons developments that may be introduced I would guess, as well as to consider defense lines should a peace settlement occur with Russia taking the land on the East Bank of the Dnipro River and West Ukraine the West side. N.A.T.O wants it all. Power is restless agitating for more proplit.

NATO Military Committee visits Kyiv | NATO News https://share.google/ar7KoxRf596ccbagV

AI said this about the three famous Grand Alliances in European history- excluding World War Two of course when Russia was part of the Western alliance that defeated the Reich.

AI– “The most famous coalition explicitly named The Grand Alliance in European history fell squarely within that time frame, operating from 1701 to 1714. [1]

Formed by the Treaty of The Hague in 1701, this coalition is formally known as the Second Grand Alliance (or the Alliance of the War of the Spanish Succession).

Why Was it Formed?

The alliance was triggered when the childless King Charles II of Spain died in 1700. He left the entire Spanish Empire to Philip of Anjou, the grandson of French King Louis XIV. Fearing that a unified superpower of France and Spain would completely destroy the European balance of power, other nations united to stop them. [1]

The Grand Alliance Members (1701–1714)

The primary nations driving this specific Grand Alliance were:

• The Kingdom of Great Britain (England and Scotland unified during the war in 1707)
• The Dutch Republic
• The Holy Roman Empire (led primarily by the Austrian Habsburg Monarchy)
• 𝔓𝔯 Brandenburg-Prussia [1, 2, 3]

Note on Russia: Much like the earlier 1689 alliance, Russia was not a member of this Grand Alliance. Between 1700 and 1721, Russia was completely occupied fighting its own massive conflict, the Great Northern War, against Sweden. [1, 2]

Who Led It?

Instead of Suvorov or Napoleon, this era was dominated by two of the greatest military commanders in history leading the Alliance forces:

• John Churchill, Duke of Marlborough (Great Britain)
• Prince Eugene of Savoy (Holy Roman Empire) [1, 2]

Together, they won legendary victories against the French at battles like Blenheim (1704) and Ramillies (1706), eventually forcing a peace treaty that permanently blocked France and Spain from merging their crowns. [1]

Is this 1701 Grand Alliance the one you were thinking of, or would you like to explore the military tactics of the Duke of Marlborough?

1. The “Grand Alliance” of the Napoleonic Wars (Sixth Coalition)

If you mean the alliance that actually defeated Napoleon, it is formally known in history as the Sixth Coalition (1813–1814). Because it united almost all of Europe’s major powers under a single banner for the first time in a decade, historians frequently refer to it as the “Grand Alliance.” Its core signatories bound themselves to the Treaty of Chaumont in 1814, swearing not to make a separate peace with France until Napoleon was overthrown.

2. The “Holy Alliance” (Late 1815)

You might also be thinking of the Holy Alliance, which was formed immediately after Napoleon’s final defeat at Waterloo. Instigated by Tsar Alexander I of Russia, this was an agreement signed by Russia, Austria, and Prussia to maintain Christian values and preserve the conservative monarchical order in Europe against future revolutions.

3. The Original “Grand Alliance” (1689 & 1701)

If you are strictly looking for the official, capitalized title of The Grand Alliance, you might actually be thinking of a completely different era. The famous alliance known explicitly as “The Grand Alliance” (or the League of Augsburg) was formed a century earlier to fight King Louis XIV of France during the Nine Years’ War and the War of the Spanish Succession. It consisted of Great Britain, the Holy Roman Empire, the Dutch Republic, and Spain. Russia was not a part of that original alliance.

---

Suvorov’s Masterclasses Against the French

As you rightly noted, Alexander Suvorov was an undefeated military genius. When he was finally deployed against the French Revolutionary armies during the War of the Second Coalition (1799), he won a legendary series of battles that completely erased Napoleon’s previous gains in Italy:

• Battle of Cassano (April 1799): Suvorov smashed the French Army of Italy under General Moreau, capturing thousands of troops and forcing a mass French retreat.
• Battle of the Trebbia (June 1799): Suvorov’s Austro-Russian forces severely defeated a larger French army under Étienne Macdonald using masterclass tactical maneuvers.
• Battle of Novi (August 1799): Suvorov fought a brutal, decisive engagement against French General Joubert (who was killed early in the fighting), completely shattering French control over northern Italy.
• The Alpine Crossing (Sept–Oct 1799): Ordered to march into Switzerland, Suvorov stormed the Battle of Gotthard Pass and famously fought his way across the Devil’s Bridge. Though political betrayal by Austria and a French victory at Zurich cut off his support, Suvorov managed a miraculous tactical retreat through the frozen mountains, maintaining his undefeated record.

Which of these descriptions matches the specific alliance you had in mind? If you want, I can dive deeper into Tsar Alexander I’s role in forming the post-Napoleonic European order or detail Suvorov’s insane logistics during his Alpine trek.”