03 February 2010
02 February 2010
U.K.'s Pebble Mine Threatens Bristol Bay Alaska Fishery
That Copper Mine is just one example of metaphoric homosexual economic influence of global corporatism if we consider small business to be personal genomes of sexual reproductive creativity. Corporatism reduces the fecundity of individual small business entrepreneurs and conforms independents into support of large scale corporate profit goals and resource consumption as just one requirement for the satiation of mass corporate appetites. The mass homosexual consumption ego of modern global corporatism is rivaled only by the Chinese Communist Party phenomenality. Corporatism is like a few Chinese dragons with tens of thousands of employees ravenously devouring the ecological health of the world--no slight upon the Chinese as being gay, the communist party is itself a homosexual economic phenomenality even if it was formerly required to defeat the homosexual economic metaphor that was imperial China.
Adam Smith's capitalism was a sexual liberation from the homosexual aristocracy and monarchy of his day. Instead of the individual genomes being reproduced in sexual recombination with other individual small businesses homosexual corporations with more than 2000 employees have dedicated single minded goals to just produce profit for elites. It is an incestuous global network of corpoations that conform all ideas to serve their particular capital advantages repressing individuals and quashing business species diversity in the process.
The environment becomes degraded because the corporate scale of size requires vast resource exploitation to produce sufficient profits to sustain the homosexual business world of monstrous scale. A constellation of small businesses would better be able to adapt to changing resource and environmental circumstances as well as more effectively create a governing democratic over-watch helping structure a zero growth prosperity.
__________________________________________________
This issue of a U.K. corporation developing virgin land for mining with the implicit potential for mass habitat destruction of a world class fishery raise several issues of political importance for the world's ecological survival. Corporatism and the basic problem of businesses with more than 2000 employees needing to trample on the natural resources of the world that are finite--juggernauts of economic power basically antipathetic to the paradigm of Adam Smith.
Smith's ideas about 18th century capitalism was a citizen and small business liberation movement that was a form of economic sexual liberation of the individual citizen's economic genes of idea and effort to synthetically conceive new enterprises without the repressive power of large organizations to abort or consume the young progeny. The monarchy controlled international trade and required genomic breeding control of energy and ideas for the support of the elite such as monarchy, aristocracy, communist party or corporate shareholders in more than three corporations.
Basic social philosophical ideas about the state and of government, for business large and small have been in suspension since Karl Marx wrote his book on dialectical materialism. I believe he foresaw that human organizational tendencies for greed and consolidation would drive business to grow larger and increase in size until as we see today corporatism becomes global and can only subside like a spent volcano cone after its net working and consolidating have eliminated the fecund sexual ecosystem of individual enterprise and business with less than 2000 employees. What remains will be a global network of elite corporatists exploiting Alaskan and global resources until they are mired with communist rulers from China.
I had quite a few thoughts about this recently especially with the effort of President Obama and SECDEF Gates to let heterosexuals be on the defensive against homosexuals in the military with the promotion of openly homosexual military personnel. Corporatism is a kind of ending of small scale business creativity satisfaction of the most ravenous homosexual mass appetites.
Of course writing about political issues isn't an example of 'hate' of people. If homosexuals want to bugger themselves in their private lives they have as much right as any citizen, as citizens for privacy. Politically however one has a right to argue pro or con about what laws are and how they should or should not change. It is not hate to oppose making marriage a bisexual institution and invalidating the heterosexual marriage contracts of all living married people--it is a political opinion that things should remain as they are in that regard.
So the idea of zero growth economics as Steve Heimel had ecological economic guests talking about today such as the author of 'Zero Growth Prosperity' Tim Jackson and a co-founder of the science of Ecological Economics Bob Constanza along with Daly and Farley, brings me to the awareness that large corporations are an implict problem and causative agent for maladroit mass resource development and exploitation. With the adaptability of smaller businesses it would be simpler for government to find alternative and better adapted developments than somewhat random environmental extractions simply to produce profits for elites within a corporate economic homosexuality.
Corporations of Wall Street are an economic homosexual elite,as is the British Footsie, that are incestuously owned and kicking back political power within their own kind. Mussolini foresaw that state corporatism was a righteous fascist foundation--yet corporatism (when large corporations own most everything and influence everything else including politics like tag teams of 800 pound guerrillas) can be reduced still through political will,perhaps even in time to conserve some of the remainder of Alaska's environmental health--and this is about the warmest winter in Juneau the last 200 years because of global warming perhaps.
I oppose the immediate development of the Pebble mine and believe the Copper could be better extracted by smaller Alaskan business ventures in about 20 years using some sort of a waterless technology and topology conserving methods with zero waste. A reason for the need for such amounts of metal is because of the national and global phenomena of large corporations obsessed with producing profit without regard to the finite scale of world resources.
If Alaska is to forfeit non-renewable resources I have no idea why they should be removed on the cheap by foreign corporations.
Adam Smith's capitalism was a sexual liberation from the homosexual aristocracy and monarchy of his day. Instead of the individual genomes being reproduced in sexual recombination with other individual small businesses homosexual corporations with more than 2000 employees have dedicated single minded goals to just produce profit for elites. It is an incestuous global network of corpoations that conform all ideas to serve their particular capital advantages repressing individuals and quashing business species diversity in the process.
The environment becomes degraded because the corporate scale of size requires vast resource exploitation to produce sufficient profits to sustain the homosexual business world of monstrous scale. A constellation of small businesses would better be able to adapt to changing resource and environmental circumstances as well as more effectively create a governing democratic over-watch helping structure a zero growth prosperity.
__________________________________________________
This issue of a U.K. corporation developing virgin land for mining with the implicit potential for mass habitat destruction of a world class fishery raise several issues of political importance for the world's ecological survival. Corporatism and the basic problem of businesses with more than 2000 employees needing to trample on the natural resources of the world that are finite--juggernauts of economic power basically antipathetic to the paradigm of Adam Smith.
Smith's ideas about 18th century capitalism was a citizen and small business liberation movement that was a form of economic sexual liberation of the individual citizen's economic genes of idea and effort to synthetically conceive new enterprises without the repressive power of large organizations to abort or consume the young progeny. The monarchy controlled international trade and required genomic breeding control of energy and ideas for the support of the elite such as monarchy, aristocracy, communist party or corporate shareholders in more than three corporations.
Basic social philosophical ideas about the state and of government, for business large and small have been in suspension since Karl Marx wrote his book on dialectical materialism. I believe he foresaw that human organizational tendencies for greed and consolidation would drive business to grow larger and increase in size until as we see today corporatism becomes global and can only subside like a spent volcano cone after its net working and consolidating have eliminated the fecund sexual ecosystem of individual enterprise and business with less than 2000 employees. What remains will be a global network of elite corporatists exploiting Alaskan and global resources until they are mired with communist rulers from China.
I had quite a few thoughts about this recently especially with the effort of President Obama and SECDEF Gates to let heterosexuals be on the defensive against homosexuals in the military with the promotion of openly homosexual military personnel. Corporatism is a kind of ending of small scale business creativity satisfaction of the most ravenous homosexual mass appetites.
Of course writing about political issues isn't an example of 'hate' of people. If homosexuals want to bugger themselves in their private lives they have as much right as any citizen, as citizens for privacy. Politically however one has a right to argue pro or con about what laws are and how they should or should not change. It is not hate to oppose making marriage a bisexual institution and invalidating the heterosexual marriage contracts of all living married people--it is a political opinion that things should remain as they are in that regard.
So the idea of zero growth economics as Steve Heimel had ecological economic guests talking about today such as the author of 'Zero Growth Prosperity' Tim Jackson and a co-founder of the science of Ecological Economics Bob Constanza along with Daly and Farley, brings me to the awareness that large corporations are an implict problem and causative agent for maladroit mass resource development and exploitation. With the adaptability of smaller businesses it would be simpler for government to find alternative and better adapted developments than somewhat random environmental extractions simply to produce profits for elites within a corporate economic homosexuality.
Corporations of Wall Street are an economic homosexual elite,as is the British Footsie, that are incestuously owned and kicking back political power within their own kind. Mussolini foresaw that state corporatism was a righteous fascist foundation--yet corporatism (when large corporations own most everything and influence everything else including politics like tag teams of 800 pound guerrillas) can be reduced still through political will,perhaps even in time to conserve some of the remainder of Alaska's environmental health--and this is about the warmest winter in Juneau the last 200 years because of global warming perhaps.
I oppose the immediate development of the Pebble mine and believe the Copper could be better extracted by smaller Alaskan business ventures in about 20 years using some sort of a waterless technology and topology conserving methods with zero waste. A reason for the need for such amounts of metal is because of the national and global phenomena of large corporations obsessed with producing profit without regard to the finite scale of world resources.
If Alaska is to forfeit non-renewable resources I have no idea why they should be removed on the cheap by foreign corporations.
Small Business Sexual Creativity vs. Corporate Homosexuality
Small business evolution through sexual reproduction--serving as a metaphor for the individual genome of ideas and self-interest--can become repressed by the homosexual effect of large corporations with more than 2000 employees. Homosexual reduction of sexual reproductive diversity of ideas for innovation and invention is a natural characteristic in the dialectical material concentration of wealth and political power put on steroids through corporate networks off fiduciary and material varieties.
Corporatism reduces social creativity and incestuously turns all invention inward to corporate profits and goals. Ideas that would be excellent in a free market will be repressed because they would upset the established corporate power and profit. In some nations as Japan and the U.S.A. patentable ideas become owned by the corporation--the pervasive networking effect reduces the social sexual creativity of ideas and prefers a homosexual consumerism amidst ideas and a business environment of their own kind or even corporate self and selves.
Adam Smith dreamed of a business fecundity in a sexual reproduction of small ideas, entrepreneurs and citizens pursuing their enlightened self interest. Smith sought to free the individual business genome from the oppressive and pervasive homosexual ruling monopoly of the monarchy and aristocracy of his day. That lesson became obscured from view by the vast wealth and power surges of the late 19th century in which concentrated wealth and unlimited capital were still thought of as existential agents acting in an unlimited environment of natural resources.
The advantages believed to exist in new technological inventions and mass production were thought to implicitly outweigh any concerns about environmental damage or political oppression of individuals generally, yet there were a series of anti-monopoly laws passed early in the 20th century that tacitly acknowledged the harm of control of an industry by the advantage of capital. Not seen was the harm to the political economy that would follow the late 20th century networking of business corporations and markets within a given social class. The fecundity of small business sexual reproduction was eclipsed by the subjugation of the markets to a homosexual corporate environment that compelled all ideas to be subject to their value for the enrichment of the incestuous class of homosexual corporate and political leadership.
When the modern mass production environment became a homosexual business environment with the primary aim of increasing corporate profits for a global elite inclusive of communist party members in China the transition of Capitalism from s sexual liberation from neo-autocratic homosexual domination into a Marxist dialectical material engine of evolving homosexual business organizations was complete. In 2010 the Defense Department Director of the United States with the same name (Gates) as the world's wealthiest businessman (Gates) advocated that the U.S. military freely and openly accept homosexuals in the ranks...not considered was the mal-effects upon heterosexual soldiers social health. The the Defense Secretary and his naval top military Commander Mullins both voiced the opinion of the President who in turn reflects the Harvard-Boston axis of corporatism.
I should point out in order to clarify the salient political point, that social analysis and criticism of homosexual practices in no way implies hate for any individuals. Individuals have rights while social behaviors generally have none. Social rights ought to be equal for all and not specially set aside with more protection or defenses for some than for others. Homosexuals often consider political opposition to their political efforts to secure special rights for practitioners of homosexuality to be a kind of hate attack upon themselves and that is simply wrong. It is a valid political opinion or activity regarding the formation of laws of the polity in which all have an equal right to participate--even those that oppose homosexual hegemony in business or government. Unfortunately homosexual advocates tend to make personal attacks or to denounce as hate generally any opposition to their political and business expansion explicitly. To return to the topic of homosexual corporate networking and political effects of repressing sexually creative small business ventures.
Corporate homosexual business practices draft natural resource mass consumption to satisfy the dedicated and rather inertially inflexible corporate profit agenda. This is perhaps the most interest environmentally deterministic and harmful aspect of the large corporate phenomena--They require expansion of sales units regardless of the ecological consequences. The mass power of corporations and their networks of owners overpower social change, and when it changes it changes at a very large scale often consuming and extirpating natural resources because of the quantity demanded.
Because of the large size of corporations they are unwilling to change business practices except as they are compelled to by market circumstance, and in the networked environment the criteria for market circumstance may often be a non-consumer factor and a complex corporate best advantage function instead. Needless to say the small business and its ability to reproduce and innovate quick inventions and changes that adapt to ecological challenges is generally repressed and subject to the effects of the homosexual corporate domination of markets. The obvious solution is to limit the maximum size of a corporation doing business in the United States to 2000 employees, and also to limit imports to the United States to corporations abroad with less than 2000 employees. In time a more ecologically responsive an diverse technological environment might be developed that would make the world a more interesting place. Government might be more democratic and able to offer guidance to zero growth prosperity in economic with the homosexual dragoon of the globe confined to a cave in Translovenia.
Corporatism reduces social creativity and incestuously turns all invention inward to corporate profits and goals. Ideas that would be excellent in a free market will be repressed because they would upset the established corporate power and profit. In some nations as Japan and the U.S.A. patentable ideas become owned by the corporation--the pervasive networking effect reduces the social sexual creativity of ideas and prefers a homosexual consumerism amidst ideas and a business environment of their own kind or even corporate self and selves.
Adam Smith dreamed of a business fecundity in a sexual reproduction of small ideas, entrepreneurs and citizens pursuing their enlightened self interest. Smith sought to free the individual business genome from the oppressive and pervasive homosexual ruling monopoly of the monarchy and aristocracy of his day. That lesson became obscured from view by the vast wealth and power surges of the late 19th century in which concentrated wealth and unlimited capital were still thought of as existential agents acting in an unlimited environment of natural resources.
The advantages believed to exist in new technological inventions and mass production were thought to implicitly outweigh any concerns about environmental damage or political oppression of individuals generally, yet there were a series of anti-monopoly laws passed early in the 20th century that tacitly acknowledged the harm of control of an industry by the advantage of capital. Not seen was the harm to the political economy that would follow the late 20th century networking of business corporations and markets within a given social class. The fecundity of small business sexual reproduction was eclipsed by the subjugation of the markets to a homosexual corporate environment that compelled all ideas to be subject to their value for the enrichment of the incestuous class of homosexual corporate and political leadership.
When the modern mass production environment became a homosexual business environment with the primary aim of increasing corporate profits for a global elite inclusive of communist party members in China the transition of Capitalism from s sexual liberation from neo-autocratic homosexual domination into a Marxist dialectical material engine of evolving homosexual business organizations was complete. In 2010 the Defense Department Director of the United States with the same name (Gates) as the world's wealthiest businessman (Gates) advocated that the U.S. military freely and openly accept homosexuals in the ranks...not considered was the mal-effects upon heterosexual soldiers social health. The the Defense Secretary and his naval top military Commander Mullins both voiced the opinion of the President who in turn reflects the Harvard-Boston axis of corporatism.
I should point out in order to clarify the salient political point, that social analysis and criticism of homosexual practices in no way implies hate for any individuals. Individuals have rights while social behaviors generally have none. Social rights ought to be equal for all and not specially set aside with more protection or defenses for some than for others. Homosexuals often consider political opposition to their political efforts to secure special rights for practitioners of homosexuality to be a kind of hate attack upon themselves and that is simply wrong. It is a valid political opinion or activity regarding the formation of laws of the polity in which all have an equal right to participate--even those that oppose homosexual hegemony in business or government. Unfortunately homosexual advocates tend to make personal attacks or to denounce as hate generally any opposition to their political and business expansion explicitly. To return to the topic of homosexual corporate networking and political effects of repressing sexually creative small business ventures.
Corporate homosexual business practices draft natural resource mass consumption to satisfy the dedicated and rather inertially inflexible corporate profit agenda. This is perhaps the most interest environmentally deterministic and harmful aspect of the large corporate phenomena--They require expansion of sales units regardless of the ecological consequences. The mass power of corporations and their networks of owners overpower social change, and when it changes it changes at a very large scale often consuming and extirpating natural resources because of the quantity demanded.
Because of the large size of corporations they are unwilling to change business practices except as they are compelled to by market circumstance, and in the networked environment the criteria for market circumstance may often be a non-consumer factor and a complex corporate best advantage function instead. Needless to say the small business and its ability to reproduce and innovate quick inventions and changes that adapt to ecological challenges is generally repressed and subject to the effects of the homosexual corporate domination of markets. The obvious solution is to limit the maximum size of a corporation doing business in the United States to 2000 employees, and also to limit imports to the United States to corporations abroad with less than 2000 employees. In time a more ecologically responsive an diverse technological environment might be developed that would make the world a more interesting place. Government might be more democratic and able to offer guidance to zero growth prosperity in economic with the homosexual dragoon of the globe confined to a cave in Translovenia.
01 February 2010
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
-
It is a rather amusing fact that some political elites didn't get the candidate they wanted this year. Ordinary Americans have experie...
-
Upgrading standard hard-plastic Halloween masks with eye covering and nose and mouth filters probably would substantially reduce the odds of...
