Recent attacks with drones and explosives on various oil targets
show the easy vulnerability of oil supplies to terrorists from the air. Drones
will only become more efficient predators on oil facilities as economic war
takes practical dive-bombing turns toward oil-rich enemies. That is good news
for alternate fuels and energy forms that become more efficient and desirable
when oil goes up in price because of scarcity.
So there is a very good side to
the increase in oil costs to producers and consumers that is a silver lining in
the dark cloud of oil smoke and fires.
Plainly Wall Street views the
food, water and energy Nexus differently than communists that consider it in
turn differently than environmentalists. The simplistic models for maximizing
food production inclusive of factors such as labor, consumers, producers, land
area, flow and fund resources etc. do not calculate that the minimalist
approach to ecospheric integrity will probably crash the whole ecosphere in
which the Nexus itself is an invasive, displacive antagonist when it becomes
the sole paradigm for world resource.
While any Nexus can be subject
to market forces, and while any system can be made more efficient, synergetic
and better adapted to an environment, fossil fuels are plainly bad and should
be replaced by electric or hydrogen vehicles as soon as possible. People are
too slow to change when all the leadership is poor. The Democrat Party is a
catalyst for the worst style of capitalism in the present Demographic and
ecospheric circumstance; they are more interested in promoting themselves
within the capitalist equation than in changing it toward truly sustainable
environmental economics.
Though the terrorists hitting
Saudi oil production had no environmental good intention motives (probably),
the interrupt on oil production that drove up prices does at least provide a
boost toward solar energy sales as well as interest in hydrogen fuel cell manufacture
and in theory, superconductors.
