Apartheid in Indian Country

Political correctness virtually governs organizational inertia in government. South African apartheid was generally held to be wrong and a hindrance to western assertions of democracy as superior to crass dictatorship of a proletariat. It would be inconvenient to say truthfully that American Indian Reservations are held to be a beneficial form of apartheid. Apartheid in some cases cannot be good and in others bad without complicating political correctness labeling.

There is something attractive to liberals in working to treat American Indians as a separate race that deserves different political treatment than ordinary citizens. Though no living American Indians were born earlier than the 20th century, they are still regarded as first peoples because of inherited racial endowment. On that genetic basis different laws and land set asides are made. It is true that some treaties to grant land to Indians in return for peace were made, yet most were not given the right to vote whatsoever as individuals in American politics. In order for Indians to qualify for a different legal status they actually needed to be different. In wasn’t discrimination to deny Indians equal legal rights if they were not equal and were instead separate.

Dividing and conquering in detail enemies of the concentration of wealth might be accomplished through numerous means in the U.S.A. today. Americans have no history of throwing off a vast class of royal aristocrats that were vampires by and large except for the brief, successful revolution by a minority. In Europe huge famines killing millions under royal rule happened numerous times in the 17th century. The Dutch lost two and founded New Amsterdam. The Russians lost 3-4 million some time later. Protracted bloody revolutions happened-they new what it was to get rid of the predatory scum at the top. Now Americans don’t take any of that seriously and put themselves into pink and lavender cute designer chains. The civil war was fought to keep white people free of aristocracy that was threatening to return through the southern aristocrats and their Brit friends (not referring to Bill Clinton or Tits Up). Abe Lincoln made the biggest mass hanging in U.S. history, of American Indians, waging insurrection during the war (reluctantly). Republicans took democracy seriously.

In many Indian rights and Indian sovereignty issues today that would have Indians join federal advisory boards to mismanage Yukon River king salmon equally with incompetent non-Indian mismanagers or give Indians the ancestral right to open gambling casinos or hootchie kootchie clubs nothing is said about restoring the Indian historical right to be ineligible to vote or get non-Indian specialized federal benefits as was historically the case.

A word about restoring the Pacific King Salmon fishery to health with a simple five-step method-here’s how;

1) No taking of fish in international waters

2) Fish must be caught within 12 miles of continental shore

3) Six consecutive no-fishing years every 20 years

4) Total maximum allowable annual catch is 50% of all fish overall

5) Sports, subsistence and commercial fisherpersons would each be given one-third of the 50% harvest of all available fish.

It is understandable that Indians prefer to have apartheid and eat the federal cake too, perhaps sharing the Federal Reserve’s cash printing extravaganza along with resident aliens that would like to retire by the millions on social security benefits in Mexico, China, India, Pakistan and wherever (sometimes in order to fund terrorist missions to America).

In order for justice to prevail and to keep the meaning of apartheid’s politically correct labeling alive as American Indians increase the strength of their sovereign apartheid they should give up their properties of rights citizens of a dubiously United States proportionately. That is to the degree that American Indians claim sovereign apartheid they should relinquish American citizenship.

The fair and balanced way of Indian apartheid might best be founded on population density for Indians such that they have land population density equal to that of 1776 in areas they actually resided in rather than journeyed across to hunt or go for war parties. I am not unsympathetic about the state of Indian apartheid in the U.S.A. My only descendant has American Indian ancestors. The ethnic purity of American Indians was not a bad thing; being separated from cultural contamination of the Old World did let those people have 30,000 years of comparative Independence, yet slavery and genocide were as common in America then as it was in savage European and Asian cultures until, hmmm, a few years ago?

Savage civilizations of primitive peoples phased out in Europe during the 20^th century (only joking), it phased out with the rise of the first Mesopotamian civilizations and entered the new phase of civilized violence and state terrorism. American Indians ran a few thousand years behind Eurasian-Mesopotamian and North African cultures of course, and most of the area that is the U.S.A. outside of Cohokia circa 1000-1300 a.d. never developed civilization at all. That also was favorably comparable to much of Europe that did not develop state tyranny everywhere until perhaps 1000 a.d.

Advanced civilizations kill their environment better than savages. American Indians exterminated many species including wooly mammoths and saber tooth tigers yet today 1/6^th of land mammals are facing extinction. I think that is a conservative miunderestimation. More likely there will be no larger mammals alive outside zoos except for people in a century. Washington State’s politicians have preponderantly killed Puget Sound and Hood Canal for fish and mammal life and made the region look like a pro anti-environmentalism advertisement. Maybe they could be relocated to Baltimore and Chesapeake Bay to fix that. Yet I am more generous than most in that respect.

Next week I may examine how the problems of Baltimore were caused by a failure to allow in enough illegal aliens to bring a new and improved work and invention ethic to Maryland. Mexican illegal alien advocates generally demand an end to whites-only apartheid of Del Norte caused by border law enforcement. The peaceful Delaware tribe pacified the eastern shore of Maryland long ago (with extirpation of local dissidents) and a peaceful Mexican labor occupation of Baltimore can probably do same to labor. Ought not a Frosted Flakes size box of Cracker Jack be provided to rioters by FEMA whenever civil disturbances occur in the future? Civil rights for the many are as important as those lost for the individual.

Ukrainian (Rus) Soldiers Captured in Ukraine; Show Trial Ahead?

The government of the Ukraine (means borderlands of Southwestern Rus) will put on display two soldiers captured in combat they say are Russian. Rus soldiers in the traditional southwestern Rus borderland (means Ukraine) region isn't too remarkable-especially of they grew up in the Ukraine or their ancestors did. To be a true borderlander (Ukrainian) for the official government may mean anyone not with Rus genetic components, or that speak Russian, or that aren't properly vassals of global plutonomy.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Name_of_Ukraine

http://news.yahoo.com/russians-troops-captured-ukraine-way-capital-082511144.html

If Ukrainian Russians actually trained in the Russian army woulod that disqualify them from fighting for their homeland? A Super Chess Grandmaster named Sergei Karjakin is a Ukrainian by birth who opted to play for the Russian side. He lives in Russia-does that mean if he returned to fight for the Ukrainian chess championship against Vassily Ivanchuck he would be disqualified as a Russian?

The United States has trained numerous foreign nationals in the United States at the War College of Americasto fight elsewhere-does that make them Americans? 
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Army_War_College

The United States trains Syrian rebels/terrorists to battle against a lawful government; http://www.cnn.com/2015/01/16/us/syria-rebel-training/  -should they be regarded as Americans if captured in Syria?

Maybe Ivanchuck and Karjakin each are Russian as well as Ukrainian and Karjakin only lost his borderlandness for living elsewhere. I think that is the point about the ethnic-political-economic battles in the third millenium; there are often deeper global new world order strategies behind them the broadcast media tend to support without saying so amidst their raving.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plutonomy

The trouble with bad government and bad foreign policy isn't as much in the details so much as it is just failing to go the right direction with right policy and the opportunity cost that compiles in areas such as ecological economics and rational response to global warming.

The problem with utilitarianism and economic utilitarianism are generally in the fact that the values are made subjectively. Utilitarian can be the greatest good for the rich as well as the greatest good for the poor. The ethical terms are simply variables rather than constants. Truth theories are used as variables too often given values to reinforce the prevailing ethical theory of value being politically prosecuted.

http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/05/18/us-ukraine-crisis-military-idUSKBN0O30TE20150518

Swarms of Cheap Drones Could Change War and Peace

Terrorists seeking to blow up critical infrastructure such as under the ice arctic oil wellheads or drug smugglers flying heroin into the U.S. A.will have a wealth of new drone tools ahead one easily foresees. Attackers of the White House could fly a half pound of composition five on a raptor sized drone aircraft, drone torpedoes able to infiltrate defended shoreline and clouds of drones with smart chips able to recognize hostile troop formations and fire a single bullet or fly near with a silent electric, solar powered engine to detonate will transform the concept of security generally. The amazing thing about all that is that commercial enterprise and oppressive governments alike are welcoming development of the little flying or submersible buggers with limited artificial intelligent self-piloting chips whole heartedly.

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2015/05/17/us_military_invents_micro_drones/

With very cheap drone aircraft made-in-China in the definite realm of possibilities one wonders how a billion little flying kamikaze warriors buzzing around battlefields would interact with human soldiers, marines and so forth? American engineers developing these products for sale-I saw one flying above the highway recently with hovering capability flown like a radio-controlled airplane formerly was-are unintentionally altering the historical human approach to military conflict. It is challenging to say of that is a good or bad thing.

Potential China-U.S. Naval Battle Over Spratly Islands Could Benefit Ecosphere Conservation

The gross Chinese destruction of healthy reef habitat to build up land and claims to sovereignty over the the Spratly islands-a no man's land if there ever was highlights the idiotic use of power to grab real estate. to a certain extent there wasn't even enough land for marines, of any side, to land on. The first good typhon might drown whatever is built up there. Marine life can find the place a paradise though. It is mankind that stupidly destroys sea life in innumerable ways from acidic ocean content increase to over-fishing and habitat destruction. Building up land, blasting sub-sea surface elements for foundations and so forth while putting out copious diesel fuel exhaust is really stupid.

Obviously naval battles of scale are difficult to film these decades. The last great naval surface battles the U.S. navy played a major part in were during the second world war. One U.S. destroyer escort captain made a suicidal run at a Japanese cruiser as part of an engagement off Alaska.  Captain Dan Evans was awarded the medal of honor though his body was never found. Probably a great cruise missile conflagration and complete destruction of anything built up or located in the Spratly islands would be good television viewing yet it would be expensive and polluting.

Is it possible the place could be made a marine sanctuary to let fish recover health there a little before venturing outside? Potential warring sides could instead defend the marine sanctuary.

The Early U.S.A. Would Have Been Littered With Broadcast Media Corpses if the Freqs Existed

The first amendment was created long before dueling became outlawed. The founders respected free speech yet they also respected a man's right to defend against common slander, defamation and so forth. They new that legal dueling made citizens temper what they choose to say publicly because they would be accountable for it. The broadcast media today has made a complete farce of free speech. They are like the wild kudzu plant that has overgrown the south as a noxious weed. Fair and balanced broadcast verbiage cannot really be achieved unless listeners can duel the broadcasters if they wish.

A restoration of free speech parameters consistent with some modicum of personal honor and integrity should be developed. Actually the most practical way would be to deny organized crime access to broadcast wavelengths and use new technology to give all broadcast frequencies to individual citizens to share in some kind of fair non-preferential order. It might be desirable to some to shoot the infected dogs (whoever they are), yet Christian virtue must temper the will of classical virtue to exact just retribution now and then.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution

The wikipedia article below relates that dueling presented a 'quick and easy way to settle disputes outside the courts' in the American west and south until the civil war. The broadcast media exploitation of the first amendment to hide behind as a tool to use abusive language or perpetrate organized torts in a legally hard-to-charge paradigm would have been disambiguated in the era of legal dueling.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dueling_in_the_United_States_South

Alexander Hamilton was a great political theorist, yet the third V.P. of the United States Aaron Burr ended his life in a duel in 1804. Early America would have been littered with corpses of today's broadcast media if they had been as they are with today's tools for tyranny in 1800.

The Appearance of Spirit from the Inanimate Material of the Cosmos

Spirit arises from the material cosmos directed by the will of God. The failure or unwillingness to recognize the ascendence of spirit and to remain simple animate mass that ratiocinates is a kind of dampened fuse dumb down of human potential that God intended evidently to achieve a spiritual health.

In the beginning God created the Universe. In chapter two God creates man outside of the thermodynamically submerged world. Adam and Eve were created directly by God-not born and in that perfect condition of spirit they sinned wilfully disobeying God instructions not to eat from the tree of knowledge. Moral awareness of the difference between good and evil is a fundamental break with the natural animal world that has no awareness of good, evil or any other moral concepts-it simply consumes other life and inputs energy to grow. Mankind was supposed to be more than that.

Apparently Adam and Eve were downloaded from a more spiritual into a material world and Universe.  Adam was made to work and Eve was made to have the painful experience of childbirth. They were infused into history at the dawn of civilization and integrated with the surrounding human life. Adam and Eve and their descendants the Jews were given the role of being a priesthood to the rest of the world. God gave the proto-evangelium immediately after the fall indicating that he would some day send a savior to enable humanity to overcome the problem of willful disobedience that makes humanity an unacceptably imperfect spiritual subject for God who is a perfect Spirit.

It was the descendants of Adam and Eve through Abraham with the Abrahamic covenant and through Moses and David with their covenants that the Servant-King Isaiah prophesied of appeared in the nation of Israel. Jesus Christ was born as one of Abraham's and David's descendants as prophesied. His ministry of salvation was given to anyone of faith in his ability to overcome original and all other sin that makes humanity imperfect and unacceptable to God. Jesus Christ was the God-man without sin. Sin is the problem of evil, of temporality and of a failure of humanity to overcome the material and temporal world and its problems of evil that arise in human nature.

To exist as a sentient being in a temporal world with salvation from Jesus Christ is to exist without moral validation. Even worse than to be an unsaved descendant of Ishmael with a belief in the false prophet is to be an atheist without belief in moral absolutes-a challenge-to human beings to become more than just biomass peers to minerals and rocks with no moral awakening.

There is a problem even for some Christians in-the-world in understanding rightly their relationship to the Lord Jesus Christ while in the temporal world. They fail to comprehend the plan of God to bring salvation to the people of the world through Adam and Eve, the Jews and the house of David culminating with the appearance of the Lord Jesus Christ and to convert a majority of the world's populace to faith in the Lord Jesus before he appearance personally to conclude temporal concerns, judge the living and dead and allocate eternal occupations in heaven of hell.

Since the kingdom of God is increasing and pre-destined to increase-although possibly not in an invariant fine tensor, in the modern tech world it the priesthood of believers ideal should replace the anachronistic temple/hierarchical priesthood form and convert a majority unto active Christian lives. Christian life should not be a step forward toward paying tithes, sitting as a spectator in a congregation and supporting a priest's family. Christians should be sharing small-group leadership roles equally in worship services and all be professing, active priests in church and out. Every Christian should be a missions activist. Each church should share in a global network of priesthood of believers churches working to bring more to the church, to salvation and with work banks, health banks and etc.

Those that believe that the Lord will return before a majority are Christians tend to hope to be beamed up into air evacuation while the world crumbles around them. They become detached from active missiological ventures, they have no interest in reforming the church to a priesthood of believers formation, they don't care much about the environment-one that humanity will be living in for some time. With only a short-term rather than a long-term interest in the missions field and in the work of creating a fair, just, healthy and moral world order based on a church of God and instead expecting Armageddon at any moment the pre-tribulationists just don't get it-though they are saved.

Free E-Book & Demos Crash Obama's Harvard Pacific Sovereignty Trade Fast Track

With President Obama and Harry Read seeming like lame ducks Senate Democrats were swift to bulldog-crash the Pacific rim sovereignty trade surrender to corporatism and evil empires fast track authority. The bad news is that my collection of Bush II era essay named 'Fossil Fueled Federal Deficits' that is free to download now probably will not always be so. I may raise the price on some 500+ pages of political and philosophical essays on a variety of topic to a dollar some day. Here it is; 

http://www.lulu.com/shop/garrison-gibson/fossil-fueled-federal-deficits-blogged-in-the-usa/ebook/product-17575876.html

Senate Democrats finally realized that their President is a Harvard Yard figure  steering tax cuts and political power to corporations while sounding sorry about it. Democrats are running for re-elections and the President isn't-hence the demo of the Free Trade outsourcing of defense industries and industrial capacity to China so the U.S.A. couldn't possible stand any sort of war since its economy would stop even if China's was vaporized, Nationalism is sooo oldish isn't it?

Seriously though, with direct free trade and existing outsourcing via Internet of white collar jobs and with NAFTA style relocation of industrial production to China if the Chinese Communist party that requires 51% Chinese ownership in any foreign forms locating in China wanted to bite the bullet and close down the U.S. economy they could do so without a shot being fired.

The corporatist-concentrated wealth plutocracy that is the new evil empire does not care if Americans become peons themselves and Democrats usually eat up the slop being fed them as upwardly mobile servo-unit fems and minorities. They resist a little near election time yet as millionaires in office they still want the tax cuts and fossil fueled economic infrastructure.

Nationalism is a way to keep at least a semblance of pluralism in international politics. Otherwise an amoral global evil empire with plutocrats of all political parties will probably just go right ahead and f up the planet's environment and populace before they move off-world.